Nintyfan90 said: I'm quite off topic so ill leave this thread be. OT: Neither can truly be superior to each other simply because both share like 90% of their games. I would argue around 90% of each platforms total software sales come from shared games, with 9% going towards first party exclusives, and the remaining 1%....niche stuff such as those niche jrpgs a few gamers(including a mod lol) in this thread are making sound way more important than they are. That would be a very entertaining thread, I wonder how popular it would be among the sony gamers? |
Please see the release list and tell me where did you get that only 1% of the library is different due to non first party games, you can choose sales numbers or number of released games, you will totally fail on both. And since it's your claim, please provide the evidence
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."