By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - Woman and children first off a sinking ship. Gender equality...?

 

Should the case be...

Let the 100 women get the... 90 24.13%
 
Let the 100 men get the l... 31 8.31%
 
Split the lifeboats 50/50 between the adults. 168 45.04%
 
Let everyone drown because I can't decide. 84 22.52%
 
Total:373
John2290 said:

Im sure many of the people who frequent these forums are of the mind not to pay attention to the feminist radicals, feminazi's as some call them, so Im sure this post won't blow into discrimination of a certain gender. 

Here goes. There's 300 people on a sinking ship and 100 lifeboats that seat just one person and a child. In days past the women and children would get the life boats and the 100 men would be left to drown. 

So, by today's standards do we put 50 men and 50 women on the boats along with the children or do the women and children first, as has always been the case?

Of course that is just a completely ludicrous situation but what say you?

Thoughts? 


The premise is false, and likely only based on the movie Titanic. Traditionally, women have been much more likely to be left to die in shipwrecks than men.

In addition, why is gender the deciding factor in who lives and who dies?



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.

Around the Network

So  true.



Nautilus said:
Thats where it gets interesting.Feminists dont truly want equality.they just want to get advantages for themselves.The movement may have started differently, but today is mostly made up of oportunists.If that situation were to ever occur, they would be back to "childrens and woman" first, and wouldnt even give a thought about equality.


Not all feminists are feminazis. Most of them are egilitarian.



You guys are crybabies.
You would make poor soldiers.

You probably also dont attract feminine women.
Feminine women, the women me and my mates like, dont like crybabies.

User was warned for this post



''Hadouken!''

forest-spirit said:

I don't think gender should decide whether you get a seat or not. I'm pretty sure that mentality is dead already though (assuming it ever existed). These days it's survival of the fittest, the strong punch their way through the weak.

 

 

Meh, got interested and did some googling...

 

"A study of 18 catastrophes over the past 300 years was carried out by Swedish researchers Mikael Elinder and Oscar Erixon and shows that captains and their crew are 18.7 per cent more likely to survive a shipwreck than their passengers.

This can be seen most recently with the Costa Concordia's Captain Francesco Schettino who fled before passengers were able to get off the boat when it foundered off the Tuscan coast on January 13 this year.

A rock tore a gash in its side, letting water flood into the engine rooms and causing the vessel to capsize. Twenty eight people lost their lives.


The researchers analysed some of the world's most famous disasters, ranging from the HMS Birkenhead that grounded in the Indian Ocean in 1852 to the MV Bulgaria tourist ship that sank on Russia's Volga River last year. 

Out of 15,000 people who died in 18 sinkings, only 17.8 per cent of woman survived compared with 34.5 per cent of men.

In three of the shipwrecks, all of the women died, Elinder said. 

The report also referred to the Titanic, which sank in the North Atlantic in the early morning of April 15, 1912. 

The researchers, from Uppsala University, called the Titanic an exception to their findings, mainly because its captain, Edward Smith, threatened to shoot men if they tried to board the lifeboats before women and children. 

Of the 1,496 people that perished with the Titanic, 73.3 percent of the women and 50.4 percent of the children survived compared to only 20.7 percent of the men. 

Capt. Smith went down with his ship.

The report says: 'Evidence from the Titanic is not representative of maritime disasters in general.'

Captains gave orders to prioritise the rescue of women and children in only five of the 18 disasters. 

Wide disparities between the sexes were found in the 1994 sinking of the MS Estonia in the Baltic Sea, which killed 852 people. 

Only 5.4 percent of the women onboard survived, compared to 22 percent of the men. 

The researchers noted that men, thanks to their physical strength, have better chances of surviving than women, barring self-sacrifice."

 

 

Git outta mah way, woman!


That was an interesting read.  Thank you for doing the research a bit and posting what you found.  



...

Around the Network

I think feminazis would still choose 100 woman because men are all predator pigs...

Myself I would leave my place for my wife and kid, but since I have no responsibility over other man woman I would try to find a spot for me, but would still try to save the kid that would be from them.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

I'm not against "women and children first", it makes sense to have some kind of priority to avoid chaos, and it also makes sense to avoid having a priority based on raw power only that would let any kid and girl die. I would certainly give priority to my own wife and kid. But I don't think either than any single woman on Earth, any stupid b*tch, even if she killed her own baby or is a vegetarian, even if she's fat and takes 3 places, deserve in any case so much to live I need to die for her and let my own kid grow up without a father, and without resources. So, it can't be an absolute rule for me, I think.



John2290 said:
DonFerrari said:
I think feminazis would still choose 100 woman because men are all predator pigs...

Myself I would leave my place for my wife and kid, but since I have no responsibility over other man woman I would try to find a spot for me, but would still try to save the kid that would be from them.

Exactly...of course I'm sure you would find a place for other mothers and their children. ...no? Tbh, I would give my life for any woman or child and beat the shit outta any man who says otherwise 


Well if we are limited to a very strict 100 woman and only 100 seats there wouldn't be a way to save my family and be alive to provide without taking a place from at least one female... I would probably pick the place of a woman with no children or already old enough to have created her family... but if all woman had young child, would be a big moral dilemma.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

lol this thread is an example of how men are so easily manipulated by their identity of protector and provider

it really is one of the most pathetic things i've come to acknowledge about men many of whom would then claim that they are trying to bring about equality lol

the fact of the matter is that the human population is at 7 billion or 7 000 000 000 we are the most successful species on the planet with no concern at all for our survival... how could someone then really use survival as an argument here for why women are preferred

just say that you value your life less than that of a woman

now the argument for children i can definitely stand behind



Ajax said:
You guys are crybabies.
You would make poor soldiers.

You probably also dont attract feminine women.
Feminine women, the women me and my mates like, dont like crybabies.


yes because if you don't throw your life away for lies ( which is what most recent wars are based on btw ) then your life isn't worth living lol

with regards to women if the only reason your woman is with you is because she knows you will do all of the work and make all of the sacrifices then i must say that i do not envy you

i personally think that there's more to life than being a puppet 

that you actually seem to take pride in this is funny