John2290 said:
|
I think that if you're going to call something shit, restraining to do so in the title is just dumb. Just go for it. It's rude either way, censoring only makes it worse.
They should... | |||
| ...take time to polish an... | 72 | 32.00% | |
| ...wait for Modders to fi... | 20 | 8.89% | |
| ...changes their engine, ... | 133 | 59.11% | |
| Total: | 225 | ||
John2290 said:
|
I think that if you're going to call something shit, restraining to do so in the title is just dumb. Just go for it. It's rude either way, censoring only makes it worse.
| Ka-pi96 said: IMO gameplay>graphics and Bethesda are pretty damn good at getting the gameplay right... |
Too bad they are bad at both cause none of their games have good gameplay.The graphics are just one of the major flaws in Bethesda games and everything is bad in Fallout.
| QUAKECore89 said: In other words, Fallout 1 & 2 were great game. ![]() |
You know it son.
| Wright said: It messed up the gameplay watching Geralt move like he was Travolta in Saturday Night Fever |
Soooooo.... John Gerolta confirmed? :-O

John2290 said:
I have played since Oblivion (which ironically was the ps3 version) and I was amazed at fallout 3 day one when I spent all night and a day playing up until I bombed mega ton. |
Just a bit earlier than I thought then. ;)
As most people who've been with Bethesda for a long time will tell you, they've peaked with Morrowind, it's pretty much downhill since then...not that they have ever been exceptionally good, to start with, but you will find Morrowind on every serious best c/W/RPG list somewhere near the top.
Rest since then...it's hype and mass market mostly - FO3 was not proper sequel to FO1/2, yet mainstream loved it, Skyrim pales to any TES game before it (well, never played Arena, so can't say anything about that one), yet mainstream loved it. They are not bad games per se, they are just not exceptional, even by their own standards, but mass market seems to like them.
I have no personal attachment to them, Morrowind is their only game that I really liked a lot, and even that is some 8.5/10 for me - but there are a lot of people who still like their games, both old fans and new, and Bethesda seems to keep delivering for them...tbh, I will play them as well, but that mostly comes down to lack of good titles in the genre, and them still being able to make solid 7.5-8/10 games.
I rest my case. Ill dig up this thread after a week or two. Just to see if there are any bugs/glitches besides the perfomance in graphics. But if somenone thinks that this game wont have bugs/glitches, then he needs to think again :)
John2290 said:
|
I expected all these flaws and knew fans would blindly support this game regardless.Funny how the same defenders criticise other broken games or criticise other games because of their length,having QTE or being linear even though they are well designed.The media does is too.
While the Witcher 3 is my favorite game this generation and Skyrim is one of my favorite from last gen I do think Bethesda needs to fix these glitchy mess. However, I do understand the Fallout and Skyrim games open worlds are grander in scope as far as being dynamic and interactive then the Witcher which requires a lot more behind the scenes. Also lol at @wright who obviously has not played the Witcher 3 as the continued patches have improved the game substantially.
| shakarak said: While the Witcher 3 is my favorite game this generation and Skyrim is one of my favorite from last gen I do think Bethesda needs to fix these glitchy mess. However, I do understand the Fallout and Skyrim games open worlds are grander in scope as far as being dynamic and interactive then the Witcher which requires a lot more behind the scenes. Also lol at @wright who obviously has not played the Witcher 3 as the continued patches have improved the game substantially. |
Even Day 1 witcher was substantially way better in graphics performance than fallout. And from what i've seen in photos/videos, fallout can't match witcher's graphics