By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Mass Effect Andromeda Teaser Trailer

Yeah can't wait, love ME.



Around the Network



starcraft said:
Aeolus451 said:

Here's the vid by the way.

Thanks Aeolus!

I know they are both space games, but I view NMS and Mass Effect as being entirely distinct from each other.

I agree with that. They are very different games in my opinion but bioware would be wise to avoid any wording like space exploration otherwise some might start to make comparisons. Especially if NMS is released before Andromeda. NMS is likely to set a very high new bar for space games.



Aeolus451 said:
starcraft said:

Thanks Aeolus!

I know they are both space games, but I view NMS and Mass Effect as being entirely distinct from each other.

I agree with that. They are very different games in my opinion but bioware would be wise to avoid any wording like space exploration otherwise some might start to make comparisons. Especially if NMS is released before Andromeda. NMS is likely to set a very high new bar for space [exploration] games.

Just took the liberty of adding a qualifier there. IMO there is much about the previous Mass Effect entries that will be superior to NMS, and hopefully Andromeda will build on those things.

One thing NMS could evolve into is stand alone spin off games based in a single star cluster, once there have been enough worlds discovered and developed. It's an [effectively] endless universe out there and making stories out of small pockets of that universe is what will keep a game like this alive for years on end.



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

Aeolus451 said:
starcraft said:

Thanks Aeolus!

I know they are both space games, but I view NMS and Mass Effect as being entirely distinct from each other.

I agree with that. They are very different games in my opinion but bioware would be wise to avoid any wording like space exploration otherwise some might start to make comparisons. Especially if NMS is released before Andromeda. NMS is likely to set a very high new bar for space games.

No it's not. 

As much as you think it will be, without any directive it's not going to be much. Go and live your life, it will be more exciting. 



Gotta figure out how to set these up lol.

Around the Network
binary solo said:
Aeolus451 said:

I agree with that. They are very different games in my opinion but bioware would be wise to avoid any wording like space exploration otherwise some might start to make comparisons. Especially if NMS is released before Andromeda. NMS is likely to set a very high new bar for space [exploration] games.

Just took the liberty of adding a qualifier there. IMO there is much about the previous Mass Effect entries that will be superior to NMS, and hopefully Andromeda will build on those things.

One thing NMS could evolve into is stand alone spin off games based in a single star cluster, once there have been enough worlds discovered and developed. It's an [effectively] endless universe out there and making stories out of small pockets of that universe is what will keep a game like this alive for years on end.

Why would a game need to be smaller in scale for it be better? Why can't a game world be the actual size of a world or much more and still have a good story? 


What I meant with "NMS is likely to set a very high new bar for space games" is NMS will hopefully force devs that make games like mass effect (and devs that make open world games too) to build larger worlds/areas to explore or rather force the scale of those games to evolve further.  Just imagine being able to fully explore the "worlds" in a mass effect game or star wars game and have a quality story/rich gameworld. I think it's easily possible with games today but it's up to a dev(s) to set a new standard and make that push. Eventually, I think Hello Games will do that with their games. That might or might not be the case with NMS.  We'll find out though.

 

 

 



Dusk said:
Aeolus451 said:

I agree with that. They are very different games in my opinion but bioware would be wise to avoid any wording like space exploration otherwise some might start to make comparisons. Especially if NMS is released before Andromeda. NMS is likely to set a very high new bar for space games.

No it's not. 

As much as you think it will be, without any directive it's not going to be much. Go and live your life, it will be more exciting. 


 Why do you think that?



BasilZero said:

Dat hyping teaser. Though I need to see gameplay footage :O

So with this trailer - this means Shep and the Normandy crew are back? Odd - thought we would see a new cast of characters.

Anyways, need to get ME3 - I beat ME1 last year and ME2 just three months ago.

No. Strikes me as a farewell. Shepard should be long dead by the time our mission in the Andromeda galaxy begins.



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

I know they already told us that there wouldn't be anything big at N7, but I'm tired of teasers. Two years ago they showed the little artworks with the new Mako and this year we've had two teasers that showed basically nothing about the game. Where's the trailer Bioware?

On a side note, why use Sheppard? Because after the events of ME3, how can he/she do that speech?



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

Aeolus451 said:
binary solo said:

Just took the liberty of adding a qualifier there. IMO there is much about the previous Mass Effect entries that will be superior to NMS, and hopefully Andromeda will build on those things.

One thing NMS could evolve into is stand alone spin off games based in a single star cluster, once there have been enough worlds discovered and developed. It's an [effectively] endless universe out there and making stories out of small pockets of that universe is what will keep a game like this alive for years on end.

Why would a game need to be smaller in scale for it be better? Why can't a game world be the actual size of a world or much more and still have a good story? 


What I meant with "NMS is likely to set a very high new bar for space games" is NMS will hopefully force devs that make games like mass effect (and devs that make open world games too) to build larger worlds/areas to explore or rather force the scale of those games to evolve further.  Just imagine being able to fully explore the "worlds" in a mass effect game or star wars game and have a quality story/rich gameworld. I think it's easily possible with games today but it's up to a dev(s) to set a new standard and make that push. Eventually, I think Hello Games will do that with their games. That might or might not be the case with NMS.  We'll find out though.

 

 

 

Who said anything about scale? I don't believe NMS will do anything to set any kind of bar for interplanetary epic RPGs. That's a type of space game. So far there's no scripted story I know of, and I thought that's the point of NMS. It's pretty much a blank canvas on which to paint your own story and have your adventures. So far as I can see the game mostly has scale and a sense of adventure as the principle compelling points of difference, I guess we'll see if it has anything else.



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix