I will buy the final version with all DLC and for a fraction of full price and with great modz.

Deus Ex (2000) - a game that pushes the boundaries of what the video game medium is capable of to a degree unmatched to this very day.
![]()
I will buy the final version with all DLC and for a fraction of full price and with great modz.

Deus Ex (2000) - a game that pushes the boundaries of what the video game medium is capable of to a degree unmatched to this very day.
![]()
I'm skipping this and waiting for the bugs to be ironed out (if ever). Looks like November will be purely dedicated to battlefront.
Every Bethesda game (especially Fallout and The Elder Scrolls games) are full of bugs on launch, people need to wait at least 3 months before they consider to start play those games.




This game will need some time to be ironed out to optimal condition. I will wait some time, there's no hurry. There are too many games and very little time as it is.
.
Last edited by OttoniBastos - on 08 April 2019Bethesda are really among the worst dev in the world when it come to technic. Even on AAA, they cant give more than old gen visuals + 30 fps with drops on current gen, that's a real shame, but i guess it'es because the project was planned for old gen and ported on current gen at the end, they cant be that bad.
There is absolutely no work to make a decent open world for current gen consoles tech wise
Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:
PS4: 17m XB1: 10m WiiU: 10m Vita: 10m
PenguinZ said:
|
Not after 15 hours, not with a single ps4 game i experienced a freeze yet. Crashes yes but no freezing. I have heard people had like 15 freezes trying to platin fallout 3 on ps3. This unexcaptable by my standards, so i dont except much difference by bethesda for their ps4 games.
OttoniBastos said:
Fallout is that type of franchise where the score range is already decided long before reviewers even get their hands on the game. Doesn't matter how bugged the game is,they will ignore that(together with some basic design flaws like plot holes in the story,dumb down gameplay mechanics,etc...) and when the shitstorm start they will make some articles about it.(maybe calling people entitled) Then when(if) the game keep having bugs and glitches for a long time,they will be forced to point that out(just like happened with fallout 3), but nobody will lower their score and even if they do metacritic will be already set and nothing will change. Then years from now when the dust has settle and the hype googles drop off,people will start to point out all the design flaws and lack of polishness this game have that the "entitled" people from 2015 were talking about.Even some gaming sites like eurogamer will get some balls and talk about this(they did that this year for fallout 3...8 year late tho). In the end, reviews are useless for games like fallout 'cause reviewers are historically in bed with the devs/franchise. Playing the game or at least watching somebody else play on twitch are the only options in this cases. |
Exactley man
It's funny to see how everyone shits on Devil's Third and praise Fallout 4 for poor graphic and justify trashy optimisation. Hypocrisy as is.
| Boberkun said: It's funny to see how everyone shits on Devil's Third and praise Fallout 4 for poor graphic and justify trashy optimisation. Hypocrisy as is. |
Read above ;)
Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:
PS4: 17m XB1: 10m WiiU: 10m Vita: 10m