It looks fine, its not the best but its not the worst either.

Average person does expect to see a circle, and not's a octacon. In the case of the Fallout boy statue. I don't care. But a lot of people will out right say graphics 2/10.

The screenshots look blurry to me...

Anyone who says they look last gen fallout, obviously doesn't remember how bad FO3 on ps3 was, it was not a great looking game.

As long as the game play is the same or better than FO3, then the improvements in graphics are welcome :D

When I think about Fallout I think about cutting edge graphics, okay? They're synonymous

Looks good to me. What's the problem?

Wow people are so picky. Do you realize how huge Fallout games are? Of course it's not gonna look as polished as Last of Us or Horizon. But if it runs smoothly then it's easily more impressive in my opinion. Already bought it can't wait.

Looks miles better than a certain other open world game on console that promises hundreds of hours of fun.

Actually after seeing Halo 5, this graphic isn't that bad, Halo 5 manage to have 60 FPS due to small open area, while this games have a longer distant view and almost unlimited open area and 30FPS is pretty understandable. Both seem using old gen shader type. And what i love with Fallout is there artistic retro future fiction, the same like bioshock games.

What are people expecting? lol
This looks just fine for current generation. Obviously not going to win any awards for graphics but you can't create a new engine for every new game. The improvements they did to the old engine are still impressive though. Looking much better than Skyrim and no one called Skyrim a bad looking game last gen.

Is it gona have a proper story or is it gona be Skyrim all over again (very bad story that doesnt engage you with a ginormous open world populated by the same monsters and cave interiors for you to waste your time). Its all I want to know.