Actually Shu doesn't even mention new games, only AAA titles. I'm pretty sure NDC counts as that. And as I've said, if people are playing these games, it doesn't matter if they're not new or not because the point of games are to play them, and that is exactly what people are doing when they buy NDC. 

You didnt take anything apart. Your "so far" means all those that you mentioned and possible more top be added. But those that you mentioned are not certainties. As much as you try to spin things, it just wont change that fact. Heck, its right there on your link. Wich definition far down are you looking at to spin this?

"To, from, or at a considerable distance". This means bigger and equal, i'm sure you understand. Then you say i'm illogical. The irony.

GR2 is not a AAA title alright (remember the topic of this thread?)? That is why its a niche title, the budget is far more modest aswell as the sales. I swear your grabbing at straws in your grand spin argument.

You are a Sony fan, i get that. No need to get so defensive when Sony's officials themselves admit that there is a problem, they simply didnt feel hugely pressed to fix it yet.

Yes, yes... everything is alright. Line-up is super strong. Everything they do is super good. Yes, i know that is what you think. That is good for you, but i will not stop voicing my opinion wether you like it or not, because i'm not hamstrung by such things.

And for the record... my opinion and why i quoted you in the first place was because i thought your list was innacurate/wishful. I dont think there really is any refuting that, but to each their own.

interesting.

How are Remasters not AAA exclusive games.

Are Remasters games?

Are Remasters exclusive?

Are Remasters AAA? 

Are new games more important than remasters? Knack was a new game, TLOU Re was a remaster. Was Knack really that much more "important" then TLOU RE? In what sense was it more important?

TLOU RE (3.27) sold more than Knack (1.39). 

TLOU RE (95)/(8.9) has a higher metacritic than Knack (54)/(6.5).

Based on the above to metrics we can surmize that TLOU RE had a greater influence than Knack, simply being avaliable to more people. Hence it influenced more people as a result. In what other regards was Knack superior to TLOU RE with regard to its "importance"?

At least Sony knows that your only big holiday game being a remaster isn't a good thing.

It seems some Sony fans will only find that out by 2016, when Sony will finally release some good stuff on a relatively frequent basis.

How anyone can think that Sony's first party line-up has been good so far is beyond me.

Ummmm. Ok. 

TLOU Re was released July 29, 2014. In the middle of the year. Knack was released in November. But you haven't answered any of my questions.

I don't really know or care about what Sony's holiday games are but I know that the big holiday multiplats are there. So unless those are all remasters as well then the big holiday game is not a remaster.

Furthermore. While "Good Stuff" is debatable, Sony's the only one with stuff releasing on a relatively frequent basis from launch.

If we look at the sales, I don't really think Sony's first party line-up is all that important. There are like 4-5 PS4 1st party games in the top surrounded by a whole bunch of 3rd party games but like, maybe when they get better first party they will finally pass up the Wii U. But I digress.

Answer the questions. Are remasters AAA exclusive games? Specifically, is TLOU RE, a remastered game, a AAA exclusive game? Is Knack more "important" than TLOU RE?

What about Infamous: Second Son?

It sold 2.32 million w/ a metacritic of (80)/(7.9). Is that more "important"?

Knack got abysmal reviews and is not an AAA game. TLOU was a remaster of a one year old game, so it was still in demand. Are you saying that TLOU as a PS4 exclusive launch title wouldn't have a bigger impact than TLOU the remaster half a year after launch?

This thread is about AAA exclusive games, i.e. first party games, why are you bringing up third party support? Where did anyone say Sony has bad third party support?

What good stuff has Sony been releasing since launch? We're talking first party games here.

I'm not saying anything. I'm just asking questions, which you still haven't attempted to answer.

Why is Knack not a AAA game, it had a AAA budget and was produced by SCE Japan Studio which is a AAA developer?

TLOU RE is still a remaster, is it a AAA exclusive game or not?

What about Infamous: Second Son, it sold 2.32 million with a metacritic of (80)/7.9? It wasn't a launch game, it released only 4 months before TLOU RE and it has an established fan base of 5.22 million on PS3 with its previous incarnations. TLOU on PS3 sold 5.6 million so they are quite close.

What about Bloodborne, It has a metacritic of (92)/8.6, still lower than TLOU RE's (95)/8.9?

Also "Good stuff" is a meaningless distinction, "good" is subjective, that's why I said stuff, and you're talking about first party games here, I just said stuff. But If you want me to answer your questions, it is common courtesy to answer the ones I've already given to you. FYI, the ones above are just restatements of the original question.

Yeah, I don't want to be too harsh, and jump all over the guy, but I agree with you. Nem"s assessment, not so much. And what does "Sony Japan is all over the place mean?" It surely has negative conotations, but I can't guess what they are. The PS4 and it's software lineup are fine.

Lol in two years time none of this will even matter. Uncharted 4, Horizon, TLG, Gravity Rush as well as some third party exclusives like R&C more then makes up for the "lack" of first party games in the first two years. I treat my PS4 as a cable box with Netflix + NBA Gametime. I sure as hell ain't sulking because the first party pickings have been lackluster so far. I might of bought a PS4 year one but I also invested in it because of future support. Word to the PS3 & its exclusive lineup of 2013! I'm not even interested in buying a WiiU/ XOne atm, I'd rather save up and grab a few ounces of that dank and a couple bottles lmao.