Many xbox fas had similar critiques for the Halo MCC reviews (which did not take into account the many many issues the bundle had).

Now, I played the demo yesterday, I must say I love the small tweaks they made and the smoothness of the 60fps presentation! so this is now in my download list ...

Still, I find it sad that reviewers go on haping the "mass murderer" line, as if it gave them any credibility (not that this is entirely false, but honestly it makes no sense in the context).

the only points I see some people taking against this release is the lack of multi-player... which for me is a non issue, I don't think I ever even tried the MP portion of any Uncharted game, and with the MP only titles coming out lately this is a good thing to keep them separate + Uncharted 4 will deliver the goods for this in a few months... I honestly would not even know there was uncharted MP if the gaming press did not talk about it :-/

or maybe the hype is just gone and they give it fair reviews?

Hey sorry about that Celador I legit did not see this and I have no idea how. If there is anything you need from my thread just copy and paste it http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=208773

Can't wait for my pre-order to arrive, so i can enjoy all 3 again. I can care less about no mp, i just love Uncharted for the story and gameplay.

I that case, I cannot wait for the day of a "fair"  Halo review. 65 is what those games deserve.

well critics are mostly assheads that like to get hype for what ever game is hip atm.

but i have to say, game critics are better than movie critcs in these regard. do you remember last year and the boyhood hype? now more and more people watch the movie without the hype glasses and well its a lame shitshow afterall.

ReimTime said: Hey sorry about that Celador I legit did not see this and I have no idea how. If there is anything you need from my thread just copy and paste it http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=208773

No worries, nice thread edit as well

65 is realy low, i would say 75. 15 points above what cod deservs.

Yes. If games were actually aging, reviewers would adjust all scores every year, but apparently they don't.

This only shows how broken and inapt the points system really is. A good score will always be good no matter how badly a game ages and a bad score will always be bad no matter how much the game improves after launch.

Basically, what we should do, is review games at launch and after a year delete all the scores until someone reviews it again. Basically give review scores a "best before" label.

celador said: ReimTime said: Hey sorry about that Celador I legit did not see this and I have no idea how. If there is anything you need from my thread just copy and paste it http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=208773 No worries, nice thread edit as well

LMAO that was StarOcean I asked him to lock it but this works too I guess