No one ever said it would be,but just like Kinect it will only add a novelty to gaming.

A lot of people took that as him saying it was going to cost as much as a PS4, which I think is way off. A new gaming platform could mean a lot of things. But I'm personally expecting it to cost $299. Though that could move a little depending on how it's bundled and what it comes with. It will require the camera, so I'm expecting either 299 for it bundled with the camera, and about $269 without it, or $299 without it and $329 with it.

I think support will also play a huge roll in it's success. I don't really mean the number of VR games either, I mean big games that give the option of using it. I think it could sell better at $399 by having No Mans Sky, Dreams, and GT7 support, than it could at $299 without them.

GT7 actually brings up an interesting point aswell. I view the price issue that VR has differently than most, because I have a racing wheel. My current setup cost me more than $500 and that's $500 in gear just for racing games and there are a lot of people who are in a similar situation. There are entire companies that exist only to supply that group of gamers with really expensive equipment for those games.  So if the product, and the experience are where they need to be, they shouldn't have trouble selling enough VR headsets to justify there existence.

I also think people have different idea as to what constitues a success for VR. I don't know if we'll see real mainstream success for VR for a number of years, but I expect enough success to make further development worthwhile, which will make the products better and bring prices down.

Sorry for the long reply haha

Yes i actually have. CR doesnt seem like whats gaming is meant to be. I dont like what its trying to do.

What was your experience with it if you don't mind me asking?

Though I do think it would be really successful at $199, I just don't think that's a realistic price. The Gear VR, which is just a shell for the Note 4 or S6, is $199. No doubt Samsung makes some money on it, but PSVR is doing to be a dedicated device that also comes with a Proccessing Unit. I don't think they'll make much, if any money at $299 when you include development costs. Though I also don't think $299 is too high for it to be successful.

No worries bro!

It really is frutrating how few games care about couch co-op starting about 5-7 years ago.  One thing I applaud Nintendo on is Mario Kart still has great 2 and 4 player racing.

I think people are completely missing the point about Andrew House's comment concerning the PSVR, and forgetting Sony have always said this. Sony are not going to market this as a peripheral but rather a product in its own right. They're not going to expect PSVR to sell PS4s, they're expecting PSVR to sell to existing PS4 owners. It's easy to understand the difference between marketing it as a product in its own right and a peripheral, one only has to think of other products that require other devices in order to function as expected. Take Blu-ray players for instance. When was the last time you saw an advert concerning Blu-ray that ended with 'TV not included'? Just think about that and you'll fully understand what Sony are doing here.

It's not about PSVR becoming a huge success, it's about PSVR becoming a viable financial investment that has enough content to sustain it over the years. Who knows, perhaps it will become a huge success but that isn't Sony's priority at launch or in the near future.

It's not the future it's just another gimmick to steal money from us like the hundreds of other products thorughout the years anyone remember the virtual boy?

Well I rather have VR than motion controls or Kinect :P