Vena said:
| Soundwave said:
I would not honestly mind if the NX is basically just a chip like this, this is roughly 15x more powerful than a Vita. Not only that but the A9X has a monstrous amount of memory bandwidth for a portable device at 50GB/sec.
|
It won't be, largely because Apple isn't going to license this chip out and will keep it for themselves.
The other reason is because no one wants a melting handheld with a half hour of battery life when put under any moderate load; the NX handheld will have a considerably smaller screen than the iPad Pro as such also doesn't need this sort of throughput, Nintendo will go for something efficient and proven but capable of easily outperforming the Vita at ~540 in 15:9.
|
The chip isn't that special, Nvidia has a rough equivalent to it, AMD likely could give Nintendo something similar, perhaps even better because Nintendo could fine tune the design specificly for gaming. The Apple chips are just PowerVR processors though, that's why Sony was able to get more or less the sam exact chip in the Vita as the iPad 3. A9X is just a big, big, big, big brother version of the Vita chip.
As for battery, I'm guesstimating a 32 wH battery ... so a large battery, but it could fit in a tablet form factor (iPad Pro has a 38 wH battery).
If it was running a 9 watts/hour ... you'd get 3 1/2 hours battery life assuming the game is pushing the system to peak performance and the screen is at a high brightness with WiFi on ... that's more or less the same as a Vita or current 3DS.
Could they keep it passively cool running at that for 3+ hours ... that I'm not sure. But I'm guessing this iPad Pro is consuming at least 6 watts when you're doing things like running games or editing 4K videos at minimum.
If Nintendo could run PS4-style engines at 540p resolution (approx 450 GFLOPS processor + 50GB/sec memory bandwidth) ... then it would scale very cleanly with a console "big brother" that could run the same games at 1080p (4x the pixels).