tak13 said:
As I expected,you quoted me...I had wished that you wouldn't do it,provided that our past here is not rosy...Explain yourself,I based my comment on a analysis,you can't say that something will hit a low/conservative and reachable aim with luck,it's oxymoron,where do you base your sideswipe? I friendly suggest you, that you should have rationalized that,otherwise I may misunderstand you and consider your reply as plain provocation,forgive me in advance If I do an injustice to you,but our history might prejudices me a little bit... I don't see any reason for juxtaposition here,I'm clear!Aim of Nintendo,is 13m wii u by 31th of March 2016,it's very hard to jump to 15m at the end of it's life,when wii u averages 3.25m shipments per year and shipments are in a stable rate,e.t.c to say that needs luck to manage it?Am I irrational and I'm not justifying my aspect to deserve a vitriolic comment in disguise?And I called it like that for reasons which I aforementioned and because I feel insulted when someone reproves me for the same thing,that I censured another guy previously... Where's the irony?As I present the things and support my opinion I trow that I 'm allowed to say with ease"the expected and easy target'' The epithets don't fit?And If not?Then,why? |
15M isn't locked... It's at 10M with 3years, so considering it basically peaked, 15M would be a possible outcome in something like a frame of 14-16 or 13-17M... I expect 15M but you can't say it's sure outcome.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







