By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Blah blah This gen will be the last blah blah Pachter

spemanig said:
binary solo said:
-20 million for PS4
-45 million for Xb one
-3 million for Wii U

Unified platform? Yeah, I don't think so. If MS doesn't have its own exclusive platform it won't retain any 1st party studios. Nintendo could go that way, but they are already quite far down the 9th gen path so they will have their own 9th gen no matter what. Sony could welcome in 3rd party hardware if it decided the only real profit is in games and provided all hardware met a minimum standard they could position their hardware at a premium level with more features than base units and thus sell smaller volumes of hardware but at a reasonable profit per unit.

The streaming model isn't ready to take over yet because globally internet speeds and reliability can't yet make Streaming viable in all markets. It's coming though.


There's a real big issue with thinking that internet needs to be fast enought and reliable enough in "all markets" for it to be viable. It only needs to be fast in enough markets, which it already is now, and it definitely will be by 2020-22 when this stuff starts taking over traditional console gaming.

It needs to be good enough in all the markets where consoles are currently selling. If you release a streaming only device today you are cutting off millions of units in sales across the lifetime of the product because you can't release in all the countries you are currently selling the traditional console. Given in theory streaming devices should have very long product cycles, since you don't need to upgrade specs very often, you need to give yourself the biggest possible market in order to keep selling the device. I just don't see a move to streaming only devices until the 10th gen at the earliest.



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

Around the Network
ethomaz said:
Wii U seems right because Nintendo will release the NX in less than 2 years.

But what MS will do to hold the actual gap?

Sell 85 million in the USA obviously, which is getting close to having an Xb one in every home in the USA, so that's surely doable.



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

People still buy that streaming only idea. Well, maybe for developed countries it would be nice, but it also would mean excluding almost 80% of the earth population a chance to own a gaming machine, and with the current efforts for pushing sales in more market than the traditional USA, Western Europe and Japan, it seem really unlikely.

Sony and Microsoft invested millions in producing ps4 and xbone locally here in brazil and in many countries , I don't think they plan just cutting us and the entire 3rd world. Imagine just cutting yourself out of china and India, I don't see it happening.



binary solo said:

It needs to be good enough in all the markets where consoles are currently selling. If you release a streaming only device today you are cutting off millions of units in sales across the lifetime of the product because you can't release in all the countries you are currently selling the traditional console. Given in theory streaming devices should have very long product cycles, since you don't need to upgrade specs very often, you need to give yourself the biggest possible market in order to keep selling the device. I just don't see a move to streaming only devices until the 10th gen at the earliest.

 


Devices? You wouldn't be selling devices. Streaming is a service. There wouldn't be any product cycle. It would be indefinite. The money is made via subscriptions and rental fees. You could stream on anything with Bluetooth, a screen, and an internet connection, as long as you have a controller. FYI, that's like every electronic device released after the year 2010. Game streaming can be "mainstream" as soon as 2020, and likely will with PS Now leading and XBL and Nintendo having smaller services like local streaming with Live and VC streaming with Nintendo.

There won't be a 10th generation. I'd wouldn't even call the NX the 8th generation. This is the last real traditional generation. All the next platforms will be infinite platforms, unrestricted by generational hardware, which is what a generation is. There won't be a PS5/XB2 that lasts from 2022-2030. That's absurd, and thinking that will happen two more times afterwards to some mythical 10th generation is legitimate comedy. Not happening. Consoles being around in like 2040? Not in your wildest dreams.



JRPGfan said:
fathinos said:

I think that since this gen is shaping up to be a rather short one, the way that PS4 can get to 100 millions is by extending its life with very low prices. A lot of people are talking about how their parts are chosen so that they can go down in price. And if they get to $99 i see them selling very well even after next gen arrives. As for WiiU, not gonna happen.

Another thing is if Microsoft (and even Sony) move to a Cloud based console (although i do see them releasing at least another one) people will see these consoles as a very good and even better option.

I dont believe a Cloud based console will ever really compete well against physical hardware you own and run in your house.

It ll be a downgrade to what a physical product can produce results wise (graphically & lag/delay wise).

 

The only reason for such a device would be price, it could be cheap as hell for consomers to download a app and have a "console".

Thats about it. I still think a cloud based solution would get tough competition from physical hardware, and mainly end up as a cheapo solution that caters more to the lowest denominator.

 

I ll put money on cell phones becomeing powerfull enough to be mainstream gameing devices in the home,

and that eventually we ll all be gameing on our phones. To me this is much more likely than a cloud based console.

 

The future of gameing could be the Sony Phone vs the Xbox Phone.

 

I think the first to launch a cloud based console gets a kick to the nuts and fails horribly (compaired to the physical hardware console its competeing against).


Can you really picture yourself playing an FPS, action, fighter, etc game with touch controls? Phones will never be the home console. Screens too little aswell.



Around the Network
Nem said:
JRPGfan said:

I dont believe a Cloud based console will ever really compete well against physical hardware you own and run in your house.

...

I ll put money on cell phones becomeing powerfull enough to be mainstream gameing devices in the home,

and that eventually we ll all be gameing on our phones. To me this is much more likely than a cloud based console.

 

The future of gameing could be the Sony Phone vs the Xbox Phone.


Can you really picture yourself playing an FPS, action, fighter, etc game with touch controls? Phones will never be the home console. Screens too little aswell.


What people keep forgeting is that despite all the technologies that have surfaced in the past 10-15 years we still use a generic controller to play games.

Motion control was a succesful gimmick for a while and now it's just the past, as for smartphones and touch screens they will always be viewed as a fun way to pass some time in the bus or something. Just a market for casual gamers (and kids) to spend a couple bucks to kill some time.



zero129 said:

Internet speeds will get fast enough where you wont be able to tell the difference. How long that will take? i dont know maybe another 20 years for it to be perfect enough to where you can play a game in the cloud and not be able to tell it apart from playing it localy. But then it doesnt even have to be that perfect or else BluRays would be the top format for watching movies yet more people stream movies online then watching them on bluray. CD'swould still be selling great and MP3's would be the cheapo solution that caters more to the lowest denominator.

Maybe it's true about the downloading speeds. The average bandwidth will be always faster (although very badly distributed) and that will allow the streaming of less compressed video output at an higher resolution. But you can't beat the lag. Which has a physical limit of 1ms round trip every 150KM/100 miles (given by the speed of light). The lag can't get lower than that (and it will still be quite higher).

Then you are not considering the most important thing: to sell or stream digital movies and music is convenient for the seller. The cost is mostly on bandwidth. But to stream videogames is VERY costly. What you don't pay buying a console you pay renting a server. To get a worse experience. Better the graphics quality and performances, higher the computing power needed for each single session, higher the cost.

Then there is the third factor: people love to buy electronic toys. Some love to build their PCs, many others love to buy a console and do different things with them. Which means there is a market. Just suppose one of the three (Sony/Nintendo/MS) decides to go only streaming. Streaming most of the games available in one of the two next gen consoles. What do you think people would buy?



SWORDF1SH said:
DonFerrari said:
SWORDF1SH said:

Either you agree with me or we both have different meanings for front loaded. 

PS4 sales are amazing and even the poor selling X1 is outselling the 360. Not saying sales will fall off a cliff in a few years but I feel it will have strong sales at the start but will decline faster in latter years. 

Maybe he don't consider having growth YoY on the 2nd year as frontloaded, while you consider Wii frontloaded...

And that's fine, just wanted a little clarification. It's just my opinion versus another, nice to debate a little.

Wii was a lot more front loaded when compared to the 360 and PS3. I expect this gen to follow a similar pattern to the Wii.


I don't think it's really frontloaded (unless the first 2 months, even more for X1), but of course it's a possibility that it become more frontloaded than previous generation if we look the trend of other eletronical gadgets. And Wii could be said to be frontloadish if we see how much of a step decline it had =]



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Nem said:
JRPGfan said:
fathinos said:

I think that since this gen is shaping up to be a rather short one, the way that PS4 can get to 100 millions is by extending its life with very low prices. A lot of people are talking about how their parts are chosen so that they can go down in price. And if they get to $99 i see them selling very well even after next gen arrives. As for WiiU, not gonna happen.

Another thing is if Microsoft (and even Sony) move to a Cloud based console (although i do see them releasing at least another one) people will see these consoles as a very good and even better option.

I dont believe a Cloud based console will ever really compete well against physical hardware you own and run in your house.

It ll be a downgrade to what a physical product can produce results wise (graphically & lag/delay wise).

 

The only reason for such a device would be price, it could be cheap as hell for consomers to download a app and have a "console".

Thats about it. I still think a cloud based solution would get tough competition from physical hardware, and mainly end up as a cheapo solution that caters more to the lowest denominator.

 

I ll put money on cell phones becomeing powerfull enough to be mainstream gameing devices in the home,

and that eventually we ll all be gameing on our phones. To me this is much more likely than a cloud based console.

 

The future of gameing could be the Sony Phone vs the Xbox Phone.

 

I think the first to launch a cloud based console gets a kick to the nuts and fails horribly (compaired to the physical hardware console its competeing against).


Can you really picture yourself playing an FPS, action, fighter, etc game with touch controls? Phones will never be the home console. Screens too little aswell.


Maybe he is thinking about, hooking the cellphone to the TV with wireless and the controller via bluetooth to play at home... don't think miniaturization will get us there unless for the more casuals.

I sure hope there will always be a market for dedicated gaming machines (even if with the silly social and media adds) so we can have cost efficient good hardwares with nice timeframes.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

SWORDF1SH said:
thismeintiel said:

I'll give you the shorter, though, it'll only be by a year or so.  But, front loaded?  How do you come to that conclusion when the PS4 is up YOY without a pricecut after almost 2 years?  This gen will not be more frontloaded than any other.  And sales are going to explode again once the price drops to $299, and then again (though probably to a smaller extent) at $199.

Either you agree with me or we both have different meanings for front loaded. 

PS4 sales are amazing and even the poor selling X1 is outselling the 360. Not saying sales will fall off a cliff in a few years but I feel it will have strong sales at the start but will decline faster in latter years. 

No PS console has performed like the Wii, and the PS4 isn't going to start to, either.  Why?  Well, Sony still has plenty of play on price to cause major boosts to sales, the biggest boosts coming at $299 and $199.  The PS4 has enough power to last the gen, so people are not going to start getting bored of games that look like they belong in last gen.  And most importantly, the PS4 is actually going to have great 3rd party support for the rest of the gen.  There is no way that the PS4 is going to start dropping incredibly after 2016.  There will be a slow decline until we start getting rumblings about the PS5, which should be in late 2018/early 2019.