By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Former Spider-Man actor Andrew Garfield advocates for a "pansexual Spider-Man"

The Fury said:
XanderXT said:

That made absolutely no sense...

I'm pretty sure the Scarlet Witch Quicksilver thing is to differentiate is because of the thing about marvsl rewriting it's characters because of the movies thing.

Yes, it did indeed. The thing was that Marvel actually published a press release too (I think) and just said 'Iceman is out'. or whatever, ignoring the actual plot line of the O5 X-men coming to the future, Jean Grey getting her TP too early and prying into Iceman's mind and outing him. All very odd.

Yes... the movies thing. As an X-men fan, it makes me sad.

I hate retcons like this.



Around the Network

I think Creed raises an interesting point on homosexuality

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08GFjxnDX_A



Nintendo is selling their IPs to Microsoft and this is true because:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=221391&page=1

Teeqoz said:
pokoko said:
I don't see why Peter Parker shouldn't be pansexual. Also, Moby Dick should be a cat.


GG friggin WP man. You won the thread.

If a straight friend of yours dropped by today and told you he experimented with a guy and enjoyed it. And now he thinks he is ready to play for both teams, does that make him a different person? is that a big deal? does that make him a cat?

If it does, forget what I said about helping people worldwide. We still need this kind of exposure in our so-called progressive countries. 



What the fuck? Get that shit outta here!



I bet the Wii U would sell more than 15M LTD by the end of 2015. He bet it would sell less. I lost.

LurkerJ said:
Teeqoz said:


GG friggin WP man. You won the thread.

If a straight friend of yours dropped by today and told you he experimented with a guy and enjoyed it. And now he thinks he is ready to play for both teams, does that make him a different person? is that a big deal? does that make him a cat?

If it does, forget what I said about helping people worldwide. We still need this kind of exposure in our so-called progressive countries. 


It does make him a different person. That's for certain. It certainly doesn't make him a cat, though.



I bet the Wii U would sell more than 15M LTD by the end of 2015. He bet it would sell less. I lost.

Around the Network
ohmylanta1003 said:
LurkerJ said:

If a straight friend of yours dropped by today and told you he experimented with a guy and enjoyed it. And now he thinks he is ready to play for both teams, does that make him a different person? is that a big deal? does that make him a cat?

If it does, forget what I said about helping people worldwide. We still need this kind of exposure in our so-called progressive countries. 


It does make him a different person. That's for certain. It certainly doesn't make him a cat, though.

What kind of different though?

To me? It would like saying like saying:

"Hey, LurkerJ! I tried seafood for the first time today, and oh man, I love it! I still like my ham but seafood is also great!"

and I'd be like "Good for you, spidy! now go on being the same loyal, honest, great dude you've been and save some people!"

Not much changed, maybe next time we meet I'll invite him over for seafood dinner or hook him up with one of my gay friends who is into bondage play, but that's really it.



No. Peter is not attracted to pans.



See the character in the comic books, isnt a pansexual.
Why should the movie version be differnt? just because? it breaks character.

Doing something like this would hurt sales of the movie to much.
I dont mind there being pansexuals in movies, just as long as its not a character with a long rich history (from books/comics/tv/movies ect where he isnt).

Make a differnt super hero movie instead, one where the hero happends to already be pansexual in the comic books.



JRPGfan said:
See the character in the comic books, isnt a pansexual.
Why should the movie version be differnt? just because? it breaks character.

Doing something like this would hurt sales of the movie to much.
I dont mind there being pansexuals in movies, just as long as its not a character with a long rich history (from books/comics/tv/movies ect where he isnt).

Make a differnt super hero movie instead, one where the hero happends to already be pansexual in the comic books.

How do we know that? We know he has feelings for certain women, but that's all. There are people who (at least claim to) discover that they're attracted to the same sex (or maybe even the opposite sex) much later in their lives.

It's not like we know that he's black and in the movie he's white.

Anyway, I think it'd be awesome as a storyline, if done right, though I don't see that ever happening. He's too popular, especially with kids, and unfortunately it'd hurt the brand.



Stan Lee a million years old vs Garfield what 30 years or so?

I will take the wise man's word on this. don't fucking with things that don't need to be fucked with.