By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Miyamoto discusses oppourtunity for SMG 3

They made 2 galaxy games for Wii but not a proper 3d Mario for Wii U, cmon guyyyyyz



There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'

Around the Network
ArchangelMadzz said:
They made 2 galaxy games for Wii but not a proper 3d Mario for Wii U, cmon guyyyyyz

Overconfidence was Nintendo's nemesis this gen.



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


Yes Miyamoto give me a New SMG and Pikmin 4 and im in



REQUIESCAT IN PACE

I Hate REMASTERS

I Hate PLAYSTATION PLUS

Nintendo should have continued the Super Mario Galaxy-series for the Wii U with a new and bigger game called Super Mario U-niverse, with Gamepad enhancements to the game engine.



Miyamoto talkin BS.


"We're always thinking, is there a middle ground where people who do enjoy the 3D worlds of Galaxy and those who enjoy New Super Mario Bros. can both enjoy it?"

"The recent Super Mario 3D Land for 3DS and 3D World for Wii U are examples of this middle ground."


NO they are NOT good exsamples of a middle ground.
Besides people ARNT asking for a half & half type galaxy game.

Why is it so f***ing hard to just listen to what your comsumers want, and give it to them?
They want a real Galaxy 3 game, just make one. Please.

This is metroid / animal crossing all over again.

Nintendo when you strike gold, you just keep mineing that gold vein.
You dont go trying to reinventing the wheel, all the facking time for no reason.

 

 

Poliwrathlord said:
I would prefer something different from the galaxy games because how much could he really improve upon the perfection that is Super Mario Galaxy 1 + 2.



Wrong mentality.

its "how could it possbily go wrong if they did a 3rd", the answear is it cant.

They dont need to improve it, its close to perfect, they just need new levels/area's in better graphics and thats it.



Around the Network

I don't care what, how or where, I just want a new Mario 3D Adventure.



Eww. Not another!



I bet the Wii U would sell more than 15M LTD by the end of 2015. He bet it would sell less. I lost.

I'd like to see Galaxy 3 but a new 3D World would be fine with me as well..



NintenDomination [May 2015 - July 2017]
 

  - Official  VGChartz Tutorial Thread - 

NintenDomination [2015/05/19 - 2017/07/02]
 

          

 

 

Here lies the hidden threads. 

 | |

Nintendo Metascore | Official NintenDomination | VGC Tutorial Thread

| Best and Worst of Miiverse | Manga Discussion Thead |
[3DS] Winter Playtimes [Wii U]

I think the Super Mario-series should take three different routes...

1) A Super Mario 2D series
Games such as Super Mario Bros., Super Mario Bros 2, Super Mario Bros. 3, Super Mario World, Super Mario World 2: Yoshi's Island, Super Mario Land, Super Mario Land 2: Six Golden Coins, New Super Mario Bros., New Super Mario Bros U, New Super Mario Land 2, Super Mario Maker etc
These games are easily accessed, and attracts casual and main stream gamers, of all age groups, as well as hardcore fans of the Nintendo universe.

2) A Super Mario 3D series
Games such as Super Mario 64, Super Mario Sunshine, Super Mario Galaxy and Super Mario Galaxy 2.
These games are not as accessible as the 2D games. They are mainly for hard core fans.

3) A Super Mario Semi 3D series
Games such as Super Mario 3D Land, Super Mario 3D Land 2.
These games are quite accessible, but with visuals matching those of the real 3D series.


I believe Nintendo should try to release at least one in each of these series for every hardware plattform. For Wii U we already have a 2D game and a semi 3D game. I think we need a true 3D Mario Game aswell before the Wii U fades away.



JRPGfan said:

Miyamoto talkin BS.

"We're always thinking, is there a middle ground where people who do enjoy the 3D worlds of Galaxy and those who enjoy New Super Mario Bros. can both enjoy it?"

"The recent Super Mario 3D Land for 3DS and 3D World for Wii U are examples of this middle ground."

NO they are NOT good exsamples of a middle ground.
Besides people ARNT asking for a half & half type galaxy game.

Why is it so f***ing hard to just listen to what your comsumers want, and give it to them?
They want a real Galaxy 3 game, just make one. Please.

This is metroid / animal crossing all over again.

Nintendo when you strike gold, you just keep mineing that gold vein.
You dont go trying to reinventing the wheel, all the facking time for no reason.

Poliwrathlord said:
I would prefer something different from the galaxy games because how much could he really improve upon the perfection that is Super Mario Galaxy 1 + 2.


Wrong mentality.

its "how could it possbily go wrong if they did a 3rd", the answear is it cant.

They dont need to improve it, its close to perfect, they just need new levels/area's in better graphics and thats it.


Actually, very good example of middle ground, and very good example of listening to what their actual consumer wants.

People really need to face the fact that they are not returning to 64 formula because nobody outside of gaming forum wants them anymore.

Amazing games, yes. But you expect them to sell in the world where people need to look up the guide for the Portal? Super Mario can't appeal to 'Dark Souls' audience on Nintendo console. Not only that 'Dark Souls' audience is on PS4, but it didn't even carried bloodborne into multi-million.

Until Nintendo finds a magical way to make everyone capable enough to actually go practice or think about it a bit before quitting, they will have to stay in the middle ground.