By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Lair vs Killzone 2 vs Banjo Kazooie 3

Munkeh111 on 16 March 2008

Well, what games are being hyped... oh! those coming out in the next few months, and the ones that Sony are doing the most with is Home, and Haze, which, are coming out in the next few months.
Why would they be hyping a game 6 months before release. We have not heard anything in GeoW 2 since GDC, does that mean it sucks? We have not heard anything of Resistance 2 since it's announcement, does that mean it sucks?
Sony (and Nintendo) will show of their games for the second half of this year at E3, though Sony might show some new stuff at Sony gamers day



Around the Network
libellule on 16 March 2008

That is not because u dont show a game that the game is crap.
You are just making some claim that are based on nothing (including the one on BK3)

Just wait a little ...



Time to Work !

Griffin on 16 March 2008

You people that keep saying KZ1 sucked did you guys even play it, it was not the best game but it did not suck, it had a great story and great level design. It just suffered from some minor hiccups. GG also made a great Killzone game on the PSP, it was miles ahead of KZ1 from what the game sites said. The GG making KZ2 is not the same bunch of guys that made the old ones, GG now has a massive budget and a team that is massive compared to the small size team that was put together to make the other KZ games.

We already know killzone2 has great graphics that rival and pass any other game on the market, we know it will not suffer from bad controls like lair, its a FPS game not lets fly a Dragon with motion controls. We have seen the game being played, it runs at a solid 30FPS with no slowdown at 720P, higher resolution then CoD4 or Halo3. If it continues with a good story like the other ones, we are looking at atleast 85% already.

The massive budget will allow this game to have a soundtrack to rival Lair. The game is a first party game, which means it will have servers all setup to run the game online, which means no lag. Unlike games like CoD4 that lag all the time. With help from Insomniac and the makers of Other Sony titles like Warhawk the online will be great.

The gameplay resembles a mix of CoD4 and Gears of War. Now that sounds pretty kick ass to me.



selnor on 16 March 2008
Griffin said:
You people that keep saying KZ1 sucked did you guys even play it, it was not the best game but it did not suck, it had a great story and great level design. It just suffered from some minor hiccups. GG also made a great Killzone game on the PSP, it was miles ahead of KZ1 from what the game sites said. The GG making KZ2 is not the same bunch of guys that made the old ones, GG now has a massive budget and a team that is massive compared to the small size team that was put together to make the other KZ games.

We already know killzone2 has great graphics that rival and pass any other game on the market, we know it will not suffer from bad controls like lair, its a FPS game not lets fly a Dragon with motion controls. We have seen the game being played, it runs at a solid 30FPS with no slowdown at 720P, higher resolution then CoD4 or Halo3. If it continues with a good story like the other ones, we are looking at atleast 85% already.

The massive budget will allow this game to have a soundtrack to rival Lair. The game is a first party game, which means it will have servers all setup to run the game online, which means no lag. Unlike games like CoD4 that lag all the time. With help from Insomniac and the makers of Other Sony titles like Warhawk the online will be great.

The gameplay resembles a mix of CoD4 and Gears of War. Now that sounds pretty kick ass to me.
Just to say KZ2 we now know looks nothing like the trailer. From this video it doesnt excel every other game out. Ithink you'll find that COD4, Bioshock, GoW, look as good.Also Halo 3 you shouldnt really count as from the KZ2 gameplay footage available, Halo 3 has far more enemies on screen and wide open areas. Not to mention it is still the only game to be running 2 buffers. http://uk.gamespot.com/video/928377/6174412/killzone-2-gameplay-movie-2 

 



Cheebee on 16 March 2008

Yeah Banjo-Kazooie will suck. C'mon. It's Rare. Or at least, it used to be.



Nintendo Network ID: Cheebee   3DS Code: 2320 - 6113 - 9046

 

Around the Network
Chrizum on 16 March 2008
Griffin said:
You people that keep saying KZ1 sucked did you guys even play it, it was not the best game but it did not suck, it had a great story and great level design. It just suffered from some minor hiccups. GG also made a great Killzone game on the PSP, it was miles ahead of KZ1 from what the game sites said. The GG making KZ2 is not the same bunch of guys that made the old ones, GG now has a massive budget and a team that is massive compared to the small size team that was put together to make the other KZ games.

We already know killzone2 has great graphics that rival and pass any other game on the market, we know it will not suffer from bad controls like lair, its a FPS game not lets fly a Dragon with motion controls. We have seen the game being played, it runs at a solid 30FPS with no slowdown at 720P, higher resolution then CoD4 or Halo3. If it continues with a good story like the other ones, we are looking at atleast 85% already.

The massive budget will allow this game to have a soundtrack to rival Lair. The game is a first party game, which means it will have servers all setup to run the game online, which means no lag. Unlike games like CoD4 that lag all the time. With help from Insomniac and the makers of Other Sony titles like Warhawk the online will be great.

The gameplay resembles a mix of CoD4 and Gears of War. Now that sounds pretty kick ass to me.

This is not meant to be a troll, but FPS games that run @ 30 fps with dual analog controls are unplayable in my opinion. I'd rather have a less pretty game run @ 60 fps than 30, because dual analog control is slooooooooow and 30 fps doesn't make it any better.

Killzone 2: pass.



Mars on 16 March 2008

Starcraft i commend you, being one of the biggest most successful trolls on here cant come easy. Some of the best troll threads ever are made by you.

Your same old stupid opinion of Sony quiet on K2 is bad BS, your really getting plenty millage of that ain't yahh.

starcraft on 16 March 2008
Mars said:

Starcraft i commend you, being one of the biggest most successful trolls on here cant come easy. Some of the best troll threads ever are made by you.

Your same old stupid opinion of Sony quiet on K2 is bad BS, your really getting plenty millage of that ain't yahh.

You are Blue3.

Discussion ends. 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

Dallinor on 16 March 2008
starcraft said:

Many of you will have seen (or indeed posted in) the prequel to this thread. Given the silence Sony has exhibited lately over Killzone 2 and the obvious parallel to the lead-up to Lair's release once Sony realized it sucked, I thought I should look at other games that have experienced something similar.


Seen as you didn't reply to the comment I made in the first thread I'll repost it here.

GT had official trailers for Lair released on July 3rd, July 13th, July 14th, July 23rd, and August 29th (1 day before launch).

How exactly was there a sudden lack of attention from Sony regarding Lair?

It seems to me it was getting very wide media coverage right up until launch.



 

starcraft on 16 March 2008

GT gets official trailers from many games. What I said earlier (and meant to post in the other thread in response, sorry) is that the 'relative' silence began at E3, when Lair (which was expected to get a strong showing) scarcely made an appearance. I don't think it was even there in a playable form, just a few months from launch.



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS