None of those ps4 "remasters" are exclusive either because I can play the same exact game (minus the rez and fps increase) on my ps3.  At least the remasters on xbox one looks different, plays different , sounds different and usually comes with a lot more content (new multiplayer modes and and content that wasn't on the 360). Since you count those games as remasters, should we now say all PC games are remasters? And as I said, tomb raider can be on ps4, but it is up to square enix if they want to make the game for the ps4 from the ground up and readvertise the game. Nobody knows 100 percent sure if this will happend.

Also, I look at overall scores because it shows what games are objectively good. I'll be the first to admit I played games that scored average reviews and I still enjoy them a lot. However, I also admit that those games are objectively average.

Remasters are not exclusive anyway, so i dont know why you are talking about PS3 remasters. Every person with common sense know Square Enix will not be crazy enough to skip the biggest user base and biggesdt TR fanbase by far

If you were objective, you would look at all reviews made and see it is objectively very good.

Not necessarly. Microsoft is paying for the advertisement and development of the 360 and xbox one version (and more than likely pc version) so there is essentially no risk for square enix at all. So if the game doesn't sell well or it is dissapointing square enix doesn't suffer. However, if they make the ps4 version and it flops square enix will lose money. If memory serves me correctly Square Enix lost money on the Tomb Raider reboot.

Just think 2s, thé développement is already made, port will cost pretty much nothing, so its a win win for them, they just have to publish it on PS4, that will cost nothing compared to all thé money they will get with a PS4 version ( likely much more than with One version ), it is impossible for thé PS4 version to flop, nonsense