going by looks & fps: Xbox One > PS3 > XB360. (just me eye balling the video)
Why wasnt the ps4 version shown as well?
"From the word go, cut-scenes stutter by a frame every time the camera cuts to a new angle (seemingly due to a lighting pass switching each time). Emerging to Manhattan's complex of skyscrapers, most of the game's traversal then unfolds at around 20-25fps with highly intrusive screen-tear. It's absolutely among the worst performing games on Xbox One to date, despite its relatively modest origins."
"The real salt in the wound is how Xbox One's delivery of Prototype 2 compares to last-gen versions. Neither PS3 or Xbox 360 exactly aced it on this front; the Microsoft release suffered from heavy tearing and worse frame-rates overall, leaving PS3 the victor in our original Face-Off."
"Worse still is the fact PS3 completely overshadows Xbox One in playability. Throughout our tests, Sony's last-gen machine runs with no tearing at all, and yet still manages to consistently best both Xbox machines in frame-rate, both old and new."
- http://www.eurogamer.net
Ouch.
I honestly feel like if your going call a game a remaster, you need to make sure it looks better, and runs better than last gens versions (at the least).
Otherwise its just a port. A lazy port.