Lawlight said:
padib said:
Lawlight said:
In the way that it became a fad. Fads are lucky strikes.
|
Kind of like Pokemon, or Mario?
We don't really know why the Wii fizzled, so to just dismiss it as a fad is ignoring that Nintendo has many times struck lightning and held it. Who knows, the Wii craze could reignite, my best conclusion on the Wii situation is that people got saturated with it and it was poorly managed in the end of the Wii's lifecycle.
|
Pokemon wasn't really a lucky strike though - they spent $50M marketing it in the west 2 decades ago. Mario was shipped with every console sold.
But I can you why the Wii fizzled. It was a gimmick that catered to the casual audience (not to be confused with mainstream) like the elderly - an audience who's not actually interested in gaming but toys. They probably looked at the Eye Toy fad and decided to make a console based on that gimmick.
|
Let us assume for a moment that the kind of people who bought the Wii still really wanted that kind of experience. What games on the Wii U would appeal to them?
Wii Sports was an upgraded version of the first game, with HD graphics (like it matters in Wii Sports) online, and it wasn't even on store shelves for like a year. Wii Fit was incredibly poorly handled (no hardware bundle? Digital only at launch? Wtf guys?).
Wii Party was actually pretty fun and had some interesting
Aside from those, what effort did Nintendo put into creating games for the Wii audience? You could argue for the Mario games, but those weren't the driving force for the truly casual audience that made the Wii a success.
Point is, I can't say for certain that the Wii wouldn't have fizzled out, but it's not as simple to say that the audience lost interest. Nintendo did a truly shitty job in their effort to keep that market. From the name of the console, to the confusing marketing, to the games, they fucked up at every turn. The decline could be as much about Nintendo's failures as it was about the Wii just being a fad.