By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Libertarianism?

fkusumot said:
outlawauron said:

rocketpig said:

Boil it down and you've got yourself a moderate Libertarian, which isn't that far from a classic Republican before the party went and found God.


Wanted to respond to this.

So your saying that Libertarians are good because they don't believe in God, and that God is the reason for the downfall for the Republican party. (despite early republicans still believing in God.)

Or did I take it out of context?


I'm not rocketpig but I took what he meant as a moderate libertarian being akin to the old North-East brand of republicanism circa 1940 up to the point when the reactionary christian agenda hijacked the previous republican values. If I got that wrong I'm sure rocketpig will rip me a new one.


That pretty much sums it up. If you like, I can still try to rip you a new one, though.

The Republican's party line of touting the religious right defies the old principles of the party. In years past, Republicans were the ones who distanced themselves from religion. It sickens me to see the party change its stance so drastically and defy some of the core principles of the old Republican party.




Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/

Around the Network
fkusumot said:
Final-Fan said:
It looks to me like Republican America has a hard-on for gay-bashing. And libertarians are helping to stroke it.
That's odd. Why would libertarians be against homosexuality? Does libertarianism have a moral code? And if it does, what is it's philosophical underpinning?
No, you and rocketpig are correct. I said that in in connection with my conversation with DKII and perhaps I overreached.

I was talking about how strange it is to me that the Libertarian movement is so cozy with the Republican Party, and NOT the Democratic Party (AFAIK) because it seems to me that it has equal areas of virulent disagreement and enthusiastic agreement with both (civil liberties/secularism, deregulation/privatization/etc.).

DKII said it was because the Republican desire to undercut civil liberties was not in any danger of succeeding (although in retrospect I'm not entirely sure he was serious), and although the past eight years has mountains of evidence to the contrary the anti-gay initiatives are what first came to mind. [edit: And does the Libertarian Party fight these initiatives as much as it should, or give them a partial pass for the sake of their allies? My earlier post was alleging a certain amount of guilt by association, I suppose.]

Can you answer the question I posed earlier, rocketpig? Why do libertarians seem to be so much cozier with Republicans, with whom they partially agree (market deregulation/privatization/etc.) and partially disagree (civil liberties/secularism), than with Democrats, with whom they also partially agree (civil liberties/secularism) and partially disagree (market regulation/gov't programs/etc.) If anyone here can answer it, you probably can.

Tag (courtesy of fkusumot): "Please feel free -- nay, I encourage you -- to offer rebuttal."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My advice to fanboys: Brag about stuff that's true, not about stuff that's false. Predict stuff that's likely, not stuff that's unlikely. You will be happier, and we will be happier.

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." - Sen. Pat Moynihan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The old smileys: ; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for , let me know!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I have the most epic death scene ever in VGChartz Mafia.  Thanks WordsofWisdom! 

Final-Fan said:
fkusumot said:
Final-Fan said:
It looks to me like Republican America has a hard-on for gay-bashing. And libertarians are helping to stroke it.
That's odd. Why would libertarians be against homosexuality? Does libertarianism have a moral code? And if it does, what is it's philosophical underpinning?
No, you and rocketpig are correct. I said that in in connection with my conversation with DKII and perhaps I overreached.

I was talking about how strange it is to me that the Libertarian movement is so cozy with the Republican Party, and NOT the Democratic Party (AFAIK) because it seems to me that it has equal areas of virulent disagreement and enthusiastic agreement with both (civil liberties/secularism, deregulation/privatization/etc.).

DKII said it was because the Republican desire to undercut civil liberties was not in any danger of succeeding, and although the past eight years has mountains of evidence to the contrary the anti-gay initiatives are what first came to mind.

Can you answer the question I posed earlier, rocketpig? Why do libertarians seem to be so much cozier with Republicans, with whom they partially agree (market deregulation/privatization/etc.) and partially disagree (civil liberties/secularism), than with Democrats, with whom they also partially agree (civil liberties/secularism) and partially disagree (market regulation/gov't programs/etc.) If anyone here can answer it, you probably can.

The reason why the anti-gay legislation has been passed lately is because of the Democrats, not Libertarians. Many Democrats are side-by-side with the Republican fundamentalists and help pass bans on gay marriage and whatnot. You would think that the Democratic party would stand up for homosexual rights but in many situations, that just isn't the case. Some do, many others do not.

I think the reason why Libertarians vote more often with the Republican party are two-fold:

1. Many Libertarians are actually Republicans who are fed up with religion taking over the party. Almost every Libertarian I know (and I know four or five personally) were former members of the Republican party but the Religious Right drove them to Libertarianism.

2. Many Libertarians are really focused on the economy and government size. Traditionally, so are Republicans, excepting that fucking clown shoe we have in office right now. It's a choice of lesser evils. You can focus on social freedoms or a smaller government. Since the very core of the Libertarian heart is about stripping the government of power and giving some of it back to the states, Libertarians generally side with the Republican party more often than not. If the Republican party was to continue down the path set by Asshat Junior, that could change. Luckily, it appears that they're going down the road with McCain, a man whose views are much more traditionally Republican (which is why I like him so much).




Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/

rocketpig said:
fkusumot said:
 

I'm not rocketpig but I took what he meant as a moderate libertarian being akin to the old North-East brand of republicanism circa 1940 up to the point when the reactionary christian agenda hijacked the previous republican values. If I got that wrong I'm sure rocketpig will rip me a new one.


That pretty much sums it up. If you like, I can still try to rip you a new one, though.

The Republican's party line of touting the religious right defies the old principles of the party. In years past, Republicans were the ones who distanced themselves from religion. It sickens me to see the party change its stance so drastically and defy some of the core principles of the old Republican party.


Well, I'm deeply ashamed to admit it but I've found another point we agree on. I blame Lee Atwater.

I've seen Democrats failing to fight such initiatives out of fear of losing the bigot vote (or getting the other side's bigots even MORE riled up against them), but what Democrats have helped PUSH those initiatives?

The rest is a good answer. Thanks.



Tag (courtesy of fkusumot): "Please feel free -- nay, I encourage you -- to offer rebuttal."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My advice to fanboys: Brag about stuff that's true, not about stuff that's false. Predict stuff that's likely, not stuff that's unlikely. You will be happier, and we will be happier.

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." - Sen. Pat Moynihan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The old smileys: ; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for , let me know!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I have the most epic death scene ever in VGChartz Mafia.  Thanks WordsofWisdom! 

Around the Network
Final-Fan said:
I've seen Democrats failing to fight such initiatives out of fear of losing the bigot vote (or getting the other side's bigots even MORE riled up against them), but what Democrats have helped PUSH those initiatives?

The rest is a good answer. Thanks.

The Democrats almost never push anti-homosexuality legislation. They just quietly go along with the Republicans. It's pretty pathetic, really (both parties).




Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/

I'll agree with that.

On a side note, I was wondering, "Whatever happened to the pro-environment stance of Republicans like Teddy Roosevelt?" Well, obviously I knew about the whole Bull Moose Party thing, but what I DIDN'T realize was that most of his followers ultimately ended up as New Deal Democrats. So, that's probably what happened to it.



Tag (courtesy of fkusumot): "Please feel free -- nay, I encourage you -- to offer rebuttal."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My advice to fanboys: Brag about stuff that's true, not about stuff that's false. Predict stuff that's likely, not stuff that's unlikely. You will be happier, and we will be happier.

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." - Sen. Pat Moynihan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The old smileys: ; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for , let me know!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I have the most epic death scene ever in VGChartz Mafia.  Thanks WordsofWisdom! 

Final-Fan said:
I'll agree with that.

On a side note, I was wondering, "Whatever happened to the pro-environment stance of Republicans like Teddy Roosevelt?" Well, obviously I knew about the whole Bull Moose Party thing, but what I DIDN'T realize was that most of his followers ultimately ended up as New Deal Democrats. So, that's probably what happened to it.

That falls under the "WTF happened to the old Republican Party" category. To be honest, I have no idea how the current party came into existence. It's in direct opposition to the old party values.

BTW, Teddy Roosevelt was fuckin' awesome. Definitely one of the craziest, coolest, and most interesting presidents ever.




Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/

I LOLed. So true.



Tag (courtesy of fkusumot): "Please feel free -- nay, I encourage you -- to offer rebuttal."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My advice to fanboys: Brag about stuff that's true, not about stuff that's false. Predict stuff that's likely, not stuff that's unlikely. You will be happier, and we will be happier.

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." - Sen. Pat Moynihan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The old smileys: ; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for , let me know!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I have the most epic death scene ever in VGChartz Mafia.  Thanks WordsofWisdom! 

IMO a lot of it is because the Democrats kicked out or lost a bunch of crazy people and the Republicans were desperate enough to take them.



Tag (courtesy of fkusumot): "Please feel free -- nay, I encourage you -- to offer rebuttal."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My advice to fanboys: Brag about stuff that's true, not about stuff that's false. Predict stuff that's likely, not stuff that's unlikely. You will be happier, and we will be happier.

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." - Sen. Pat Moynihan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The old smileys: ; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for , let me know!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I have the most epic death scene ever in VGChartz Mafia.  Thanks WordsofWisdom!