IamAwsome said:
They're all different games, but they have the same cast of characters and are set in the same universe. Honestly, how different were you expecting them to look?? I would understand if you had screenshots of games from different IP, but you don't. Mario Kart/Party/Power Tennis/Strikers/Super Sluggers may all be different games, but in the end it's Mario, and Mario will always look like Mario. LittleBigPlanet Karting looks EXACTLY like the platformers.
If "many different games" means Mario ____, then I already explained that one. If you don't mean that, then tell me if the following games look the same.
Splatoon, The Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword, Kirby and the Rainbow Curse, Pikmin 3, The Wonderful 101, and I think it goes without saying that Metroid, Xenoblade, Steel Diver, Star Fox, etc. all look different from each other. None of these games are realistic but they don't look the same at all.
I understand this, and the same goes for non-realistic games.
This sounds like typical PR speak to me.
|
I know that Nintendo has different IP. Most have been reused quite a bit, though I certainly give then credit for Splatoon.
What they've done in the past, however, many, many times, is to come up with a new game and then re-skin it with a well-known IP, not because it makes sense, but for the sales. Even now with the new Metroid game, it's the same thing. And how many yarn games are we going to get? That's no better than copying Call of Duty's style because it's popular and Nintendo certainly has no moral high-ground in this area.
But I'm not criticizing them for that. I'm criticizing them for putting themselves on a pedestal when they are doing the same thing. Nintendo uses the same visual style over and over and they do it because it makes them money, exactly the same as any other company.
They have no right to cast stones when they live in a Mushroom house.