No.
I don't really care for Nintendo owned IPs except for some 2nd party game colabs they have had. But I guess going the 3rd party way would be good for those who like their games but hate their consoles, so I personally don't care.

Don't think it would help them or Sony, but I would like some Nintendo games ported to ps4, and would find no problems with Drake on smash or smash x pssabr (one version but you choose between smb or pssabr gameplay). Also would support Sony allowing Nintendo to port the more niche games (like puppetter) to WiiU since it would fit good there.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
Won't happen but hey! they made amiibos for skylanders so that's something I guess.
| Soundwave said: Why don't they simplify it. |
You might as well go all the way then and say that Sony and Nintendo fuses as gaming companies, and make the "PlaystatioNintendo"... Cause that's pretty much what you're suggesting.

No, if Nintendo has to go 2nd party, a partnership with Microsoft would make much more sense.
3 reasons:
1.) MS is storng in the US but weak in japan. Nintendo in strong in japan but weak in the west.
2.) MS has got little 1st party games compared to Sony, so Nintendo IPs would be perfectly complementary, while Sony and Nintendo on the same machine would step on each others feet.
3.) About crossover titles: Mariocraft and Rare characters + Master Chief in Smash bros. Nuff said.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.














