By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Nintendo should partner with Sony on IPs

Qwark said:
Sony, MS or another publisher should buy Nintendo consolegame developing studios and Nintendo should focus on handhelds, if you ask me. But trading consolemascots is not a smart idea


International companies cannot buy Japanese ones.



Around the Network
padib said:
KingdomHeartsFan said:

How would this help either side?  Putting Drake in SSB isn't gonna make Wii U owners spend $460 on a console and Uncharted 4 and putting Mario in Dreams won't make PS4 owners buy a Wii U and Nintendo catering to that vocal minority that say they are doomed is just...

Think of all the people that love Nintendo. Put Drake in Smash (a 10m+ selling franchise) and more kids get to know Drake. Put Mario in some Sony games (huge market there too) and more people get friendly with Mario.

Win-win marketing.

Or the people that already aren't fond of Mario are like wtf is he doing in my game.  Or Nintendo fans are like why is Drake in SSB. I don't think they have a single, for lack of a better word, "realistic" character on the roster.



padib said:
Qwark said:
Sony, MS or another publisher should buy Nintendo consolegame developing studios and Nintendo should focus on handhelds, if you ask me. But trading consolemascots is not a smart idea

What's not smart about it?

Sony doesn't really need mascots it has Naughty Dog and kills of almost each succesful franchise after a decade, Nintendo lives on their mascots. Mario on a Sony a console is not a big deal for Sonyfans and Hardcore nintendo fans probably think those are lesser characters anyway. Third party and console exclusive trade ins work better and are way easier.



Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar

Random_Matt said:
Qwark said:
Sony, MS or another publisher should buy Nintendo consolegame developing studios and Nintendo should focus on handhelds, if you ask me. But trading consolemascots is not a smart idea


International companies cannot buy Japanese ones.


That rules out MS, but Japan still has Square, Bandai Namco and Capcom



Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar

No they shouldn't. That would be stupid.

What Nintendo and Sony should do, something that would be incredibly intelligent and forward thinking, is allow for cross-platform online play between the PS4 and the NX. Any multiplat with online multiplayer is playable with each other, whether you're on PSN or the NN. Android and iOS already do this.

Having these guys do it as well would be far more beneficial to both companies.



Around the Network

I think that's on a too small of a scale to do anything for either company. Maybe co-developing some JRPGs or something might work better.



They should partner with MS and take Rare's IP's and actually use them.



    

NNID: FrequentFlyer54

spemanig said:

No they shouldn't. That would be stupid.

What Nintendo and Sony should do, something that would be incredibly intelligent and forward thinking, is allow for cross-platform online play between the PS4 and the NX. Any multiplat with online multiplayer is playable with each other, whether you're on PSN or the NN. Android and iOS already do this.

Having these guys do it as well would be far more beneficial to both companies.


Why would third parties bring their games to a Nintendo console they didn't sell well on recent Nintendo systems unless they are exclusive. It would be benneficial for Nintendo perhaps but I earlier see an allience between Sony and MS than between Sony and Nintendo. Mostly becuase Nintendo will only allow cross party at their (2.8 trillion) rules.



Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar

Qwark said:

Why would third parties bring their games to a Nintendo console they didn't sell well on recent Nintendo systems unless they are exclusive. It would be benneficial for Nintendo perhaps but I earlier see an allience between Sony and MS than between Sony and Nintendo. Mostly becuase Nintendo will only allow cross party at their (2.8 trillion) rules.


Because I think NX will actually target the audience that buys 3rd party games this time.

I earlier see an alliance between Sony and MS than Sony and Nintendo as well, but this thread clearly isn't about likely scenarios. It's about beneficial ones.



spemanig said:
Qwark said:

Why would third parties bring their games to a Nintendo console they didn't sell well on recent Nintendo systems unless they are exclusive. It would be benneficial for Nintendo perhaps but I earlier see an allience between Sony and MS than between Sony and Nintendo. Mostly becuase Nintendo will only allow cross party at their (2.8 trillion) rules.


Because I think NX will actually target the audience that buys 3rd party games this time.

I earlier see an alliance between Sony and MS than Sony and Nintendo as well, but this thread clearly isn't about likely scenarios. It's about beneficial ones.

Well it better launch with a real Metroid, a new M rated IP and F-zero in that case and is a graphical powerbeast of €400- in that case so it will send out  clear message.



Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar