I was just thinking about Gravity Rush Remastered, I really hope it's at E3 with a Gravity Rush 2 announcement for PS4.

what about all their other remasters? like i said earlier, if all they did was uncharted, that would make sense. but it is a reocurring theme with them. 

dude im a video game collector. i have nearly 2000 games across a ton of different platforms. just because i dont have a ps4 doesnt mean i dont want any reason for it to continue to be that way. i WANT a ps4, but if it doesnt have its own identity and i cant amass a collection of games that are worthwhile for the console, im not going to bother with it. also, a lot of ps4 games arent collectable at all. unless you pay for all the DLC, you are going to have parts of the games missing and when you look back at the collection, its just going to be incomplete. that is another reason why i find it hard to invest in a ps4. 

youre saying that their studios are hard at work developing new games, but what about cerny's promise during the unveliing that development cycles were going to be six months or less. has that been completely forgotten? he actually had me believing that we were going to see floods of games like we saw during the ps1 and ps2 days, but that isnt even close to what is happening right now.

excuse me for having complaints, but just because i like nintendo the best doesnt mean i cant respect consoles that other companies make. 

well then what games has sony published this year? what have they given us that isnt a remaster? i seriously cant think of anything. half the year is already over.

what are the sony published remasters that are out so far?

The Last of us.

If you want to count digital games you get to add flow, flower, escape plan and a few others, though you then need to count all the new digital games as well.

remasters published by them coming soon, God of War and Uncharted. but then you should count that against new games published by them coming soon as well.

You cannot assume that because there have been no releases remasters are to blame. If you think about the difference between the development process of a remaster and the development process of a new title infact it clearly cannot be the case.

I have been sick of games being remastered for a while already. Generally they don't bother me, however this gen it seems a bit overboard with them. It wouldn't bother me if they weren't filling empty spots where something new should be, but that's how it is. They are making money so they will keep coming and eating up the free spots that should be new games. This goes for all the consoles though, not just the PS4, although it does seem to be the worst offender.

i do think that WW was a waste, but OoT is regarded as the best game ever created and game like that (15 years old) can benefit tremendously from a remaster. I give MM a pass because the Zelda fanbase is fucking relentless with that game because they feel like it is overshadowed by OoT. But of course, when WW got revealed my reaction was.. why? i dont understand.

Bloodborne 

Yes, of course. There's always room for improvement. But isn't this thread a little premature then. You know E3 being a few days away and SCE having 10+ 1st party studios currently developing unannounced PS4 games.

Japan Studio
Polyphony Digital
Naughty Dog
Bend Studio
San Diego Studio
Santa Monica Studio
Sucker Punch
Evolution Studios
Guerrilla Games
Guerrilla Cambridge
London Studio
North West Studio
Media Molecule

You ask for games from Sony. So far this year, they've (co-)developed and published 3 big games (Bloodborne, The Order: 1886 and MLB 15: The Show) together with a hell of a lot of digital only games/indies. What have MS and Nintendo (co-)developed and published this year?

Are we forgetting the drove of remasters we had last generation?