It's an action game where you run around shooting people it's not going to be 100% accurate when you want to make it fun, Pretty sure that a Trench Warfare simulator would not be that fun to play.

That's exactly what I'm saying, it's not going to be completely historically accurate, because people want to get more enjoyment out of it, and certain demographics will be able to get more enjoyment out of it by having characters that they can more easily relate to.

Srry but I don't like Pandering, this just scream forced Inclusion. If SJW's didn't make a massive deal out no women BF1 then that DLC would not have been made. The chick with the prosthetic is not the deal breaker for me it's the tone of the game, it does not look as good as BF1 to me.

There's always going to be pandering in video games, as stated before the games pander to gamers in favour of historians which results in something, while less historically accurate, more enjoyable gameplay-wise.

There was women in WW2 in an official capacity wasn't there?
Here we go: http://libguides.mnhs.org/wwii_women

So it seems you just don't understand history as far as I can tell.

Well women did fight for the English forces in World War 2. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/the-women-of-the-second-world-war
Prosthetics were also a thing in world War 2.
I used to be against women in CoD WW2 but tbh if you want a realistic WW2 experience you should look elsewhere because literally no WW2 shooter is 100% factually correct.

lol There were very few women who actually saw combat in WW2. Tell me sir how many soldiers with missing limbs were put in the front lines of WW2, let alone a woman? The military would not even put me in the front lines today with a missing arm, even when we have access to advance technology.

Did you even bother to read the damn link? Those who moan about others (SJW's in this instance) are just as bad as each other.

Here. Have some more light reading, get educated.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_women_in_World_War_II
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_World_War_II
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/britain_wwtwo/women_at_war_01.shtml
https://www.australia.gov.au/about-australia/australian-story/women-in-wartime
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/05/24/women-who-also-gave-their-lives.html

Hundreds of thousands of women were mobilized during WW2.
Millions were caught during the conflict across Europe and the Pacific, allot of Women had no choice but to fight or risk being tortured/raped/abused.

Things were different back then.
Over 60 million people were killed during WW2, many countries that were being invaded had to scrape every single piece of resource, including women and children.

How many people could respawn or randomly spawn into airplanes in world war two?

3% of the Russian military (800,000) was women in WW2. That is Russia alone.
And they included pilots, snipers, machine gunners, tank crew members, doctors, surgeons, paramedics and so on.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_women_in_World_War_II

They were in WW2. They were on the front lines. It wasn't a 50/50 split, but I don't think Battlefield is trying to portray it that way?

You sound like they had a choice.
If an area was about to be overrun by the enemy, injured or not... If you had the capacity to pick up a gun, you were going to bloody use it.

So instead of complaining, do a bit of research.