By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - 16 Sony games to launch in 2015

RubberWhistleHistle said:
o_O.Q said:

that's ironic since you came here to pass judgement on games that aren't out yet

GOW 3  and journey are out. lol. 

no, but in all seriousness, you got me there. really. if i move up, your bishop gets me, if i move left, your rook has me, and if i move right or down, the queen gets me :/ you win. 

if i could retract a little, however, most of these are "just" indie games.. not that indie games are bad by any means, they just arent ambitious titles, so shouldnt we expect the list to be mediocre?


do you understand the difference between indie and downloadable titles?

do you acknowledge that several nintendo games that are released at retail would qualify as downloadable titles on ps4 and xbox one?

a recent example of this is splatoon which in my opinion doesn't appear to come close to the level of content that for example plants vs zombies garden warfare contains



Around the Network
o_O.Q said:
JWeinCom said:
o_O.Q said:
JWeinCom said:
Mediocre lineup. Hopefully, E3 will bring some holiday games.


based on what? 

Based on the fact that I think the lineup is mediocre and it has few games that look interesting to me?  Do you want like a mathematical proof or something?


my point is that something is not mediocre simply because it doesn't meet your tastes or is uninteresting to you


Then your point is ridiculous.

Next time I guess I'll put in a gif that says THIS IS MY OPINION in big flashing red letters to make it clear that I do not believe myself to be the sole arbiter of quality.  Because somehow it seems, and not just to you but a lot of people in this topic and others, that it is somehow unclear when I give an opinion it is indeed my opinion.



ClassicGamingWizzz said:
Everybody’s Gone to the Rapture
No mans sky
Rime
and
teraway

and people call mediocre xD

Sometimes i can´t believe the things i read on gaming forums...


Yeah I've got to agree. ESPECIALLY about No Man's Sky, a game which has been getting praise and recognition all over the place since it was first announced.



JWeinCom said:
o_O.Q said:
JWeinCom said:
o_O.Q said:
JWeinCom said:
Mediocre lineup. Hopefully, E3 will bring some holiday games.


based on what? 

Based on the fact that I think the lineup is mediocre and it has few games that look interesting to me?  Do you want like a mathematical proof or something?


my point is that something is not mediocre simply because it doesn't meet your tastes or is uninteresting to you


Then your point is ridiculous.

Next time I guess I'll put in a gif that says THIS IS MY OPINION in big flashing red letters to make it clear that I do not believe myself to be the sole arbiter of quality.  Because somehow it seems, and not just to you but a lot of people in this topic and others, that it is somehow unclear when I give an opinion it is indeed my opinion.

lol all you are demonstrating is that you don't understand what "mediocre"means

otherwise you wouldn't use it to describe games that thus far only have 1 minute trailers 



Hello Games track record is horrible. If I were you, then I wouldn't place to much faith in No Man's Sky.



Around the Network

Not too much to gush about, really. So color me unimpressed yet until E3

I also don't get why Sony only remasters the third God of War and not the whole series while they're at it.



LordLichtenstein said:
Hello Games track record is horrible. If I were you, then I wouldn't place to much faith in No Man's Sky.


You mean the Joe Danger games? According to Metacritic those all score in the 80's, so I wouldn't call that a horrible track record.



Skullwaker said:
Persona 5 > everything on this list.


Duh.



Chromeo said:
LordLichtenstein said:
Hello Games track record is horrible. If I were you, then I wouldn't place to much faith in No Man's Sky.


You mean the Joe Danger games? According to Metacritic those all score in the 80's, so I wouldn't call that a horrible track record.


Seriously, do you really want to play the Metacritic card? .. Ohh well, i'm out.



LordLichtenstein said:
Chromeo said:


You mean the Joe Danger games? According to Metacritic those all score in the 80's, so I wouldn't call that a horrible track record.


Seriously, do you really want to play the Metacritic card? .. Ohh well, i'm out.


Umm...yes? 

As the best form of aggregate statistical score-keeping, it's really the best form we have to compile just how well any game does critically.