By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - Gay rights...round 3

teigaga on 08 May 2015

Also lol at anyone thinking that human beings would even exist today without incest. You don't find infinite gene pools in small villages/populations.



Around the Network
Tamron on 08 May 2015
reggin_bolas said:

Also, be aware that there is no such thing as a right to marry. It's a privilege. 

Actually it's simply legally recognized symbolism, but whatever.



HollyGamer on 08 May 2015
Ka-pi96 said:
HollyGamer said:
Torillian said:
HollyGamer said:
If people can have the right on Gay Marriage, can people also have the right for Incest, animal sex, Necrophilia, or pedophilia, Polygamist? Saying no it's a little bit hypocrite isn't? Or where, or who the one who made the law, where do we determine the moral, if we becoming so civilize do we have to follow roman culture or ancient age because their lack of knowledge and science. Do we follow old culture to determine the human right. Who has the right to make the law or human right?


Polygamist would follow, but the rest of your examples have obvious logical reasons to remain illegal.  Incest has been known to produce children with an overly high proclivity for genetic defects while the rest of your examples are with people, animals, or things which cannot by definition give consent.  Marriage should simply be a pledge of love between any number of consenting individuals.  This definition procludes negates the possibilities of animal sex, necrophilia or pedophilia while giving rights to consenting adults that they should logically have.  

Hah you speak with scientific  language but you failed to mention that gay marriage also (in fact) cause a lot of disease and cause  a lot of physiological disease. "Marriage should simply be a pledge of love between any number of consenting individuals." who said that? is it science? who said that? why we have to trust that word, does the one who made that understand what love is????

As a fact? That's simply not possible. You haven't presented any evidence at all, but even if you had evidence to back up that ridiculous claim it still wouldn't be a fact.

Then why whould you follow this "human rights". Why you defending this "gay rights ", If this "rights" cannot even prove right or wrong. Do you follow a rule when the rule is made by human with a lot of flaw in it??? that's ridiculous.



Augen on 08 May 2015
JRPGfan said:
I simply cant believe some of the replies in this thread against it....
Americans are really homophobic.


Let's not get into nationalistic or xenophobic  rhetoric here.  A view or argument should be judged on its merit, not the person's sex, race, religion, nationality, etc.

On the issue itself I am stunned this is still something being debated.  It feels similar to the race marriage laws that finally ended in the US in 1967.  Same sex marriage will be nationawide in the US, likely in the 2020s.  We will look back and wonder why it ever mattered to anyone as we do so many social issue of the past.



JRPGfan on 08 May 2015
TruckOSaurus said:
Tamron said:

it's too late, you already cought homosexuality :( !

I should have known that marrying a dude would have side-effects.


This has me laughing out loud :)



Around the Network
Mr.Playstation on 08 May 2015
Tamron said:
Thank you for this thread by the way, should they ever add an ignore or blocking feature to the site, i've a considerable list of people i'd love to avoid entirely.

So if people disagree with your stance about same-sex marriage, you're going to block them. Horray for you. It's not like anyone's personally insulting anyone. Everyone who agrees has their opinion on why they agree and everyone who disagrees has their opinion on why they disagree. If you feel personally offended then I'm sorry, I still have my opinion though.



Send a Friend Request On PSN :P

TruckOSaurus on 08 May 2015
Tamron said:
TruckOSaurus said:

I should have known that marrying a dude would have side-effects.


you should have thought about it more before getting married, you know, if you just stayed "friends with benefits" and given up on the whole "married" thing, according to some of the posters on this thread, that would magically make you straight and a viable parent.

Yes I could have made a girl wonderfully unhappy. 

Girl: "Honey, come to bed!"
Me: "Umm... I can't right now... gotta ummm... scrub the toilet clean"
Girl: "You can do that later, I thought we could get nasty..."
Me: "Nah,  pass..."
Girl: "Come on..."
Me: "Alright, but can we watch Men's Olympic diving at the same time?" 



Signature goes here!

Tamron on 08 May 2015
Mr.Playstation said:
Tamron said:
Thank you for this thread by the way, should they ever add an ignore or blocking feature to the site, i've a considerable list of people i'd love to avoid entirely.

So if people disagree with your stance about same-sex marriage, you're going to block them. Horray for you. It's not like anyone's personally insulting anyone. Everyone who agrees has their opinion on why they agree and everyone who disagrees has their opinion on why they disagree. If you feel personally offended then I'm sorry, I still have my opinion though.

Theyre free to be homophobic, just as i'm free to disassociate with such homophobic people.

See, the trend here is "freedom".

"Gay marriage shouldn't be allowed" is not freedom, it's a move to restrict the freedom of others based off of your own personal freedom to wish it

"Anyone who wants to marry should be allowed to marry" is freedom, it gives people the freedom to do as they wish.

Clear enough for you?



HollyGamer on 08 May 2015
Neodegenerate said:
HollyGamer said:

Hah you speak with scientific  language but you failed to mention that gay marriage also (in fact) cause a lot of disease and cause  a lot of physiological disease. "Marriage should simply be a pledge of love between any number of consenting individuals." who said that? is it science? who said that? why we have to trust that word, does the one who made that understand what love is????


You are conveniently ignoring the fact that diseases aren't exclusively homosexual.

Also, who said marriage can't be a pledge of love between any number of consenting individuals?  Why do you need someone else's affirmation before making your own decision?  How does it negatively impact your life if I have either 1 husband or 3 wives?

Like i said why you defending gay while you againts another kind of sexual activity, it doesnt make any sense. If your previous comment said that Phedophile, is bla bla, Poligamy is bla...bla, Incest is bla bla, it doesnt make gay marriege is even better. Becuase you just said "You are conveniently ignoring the fact that diseases aren't exclusively homosexual". THAT'S MEAN PEOPLE CAN MAKE THEIR OWN " RIGHT"



tak13 on 08 May 2015
TruckOSaurus said:
Tamron said:


you should have thought about it more before getting married, you know, if you just stayed "friends with benefits" and given up on the whole "married" thing, according to some of the posters on this thread, that would magically make you straight and a viable parent.

Yes I could have made a girl wonderfully unhappy. 

Girl: "Honey, come to bed!"
Me: "Umm... I can't right now... gotta ummm... scrub the toilet clean"
Girl: "You can do that later, I thought we could get nasty..."
Me: "Nah,  pass..."
Girl: "Come on..."
Me: "Alright, but can we watch Men's Olympic diving at the same time?" 


I was expecting you to say water polo!:P:P:P:PP:P