By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Movies & TV - Spider-Man May Be Getting Another Reboot

Wright said:
EricFabian said:


and yet, he just team up with then in all big events (Civil War, Axis, Original Sin, House of M, etc etc etc)

I wouldn't call "team up" in Civil War, especially when Iron Man is so deemed on forcing Spider-Man to reveal his real identity. And I don't remember Spidey teaming up with someone in House of M (Wasn't that the parallel universe where Spiderman was an actor?).

You're right about Original Sin and such, but that's beyond the point. He was never an avenger; I wouldn't mind a cameo or a helpful hand, but as far as I know, they're trying to make him an avenger in the movie.

You are correct, he rejected their membership but was honorary member. YET around the time of Avenger Dissasemble (or just after) Bendis and I presume Joey Q came up with the fantastic idea of forming a 'New Avengers' team with all of Bendis' favourite characters plus some big names. One of those big names was Spider-man. He joined around then and has basically remained a member since, I'm not sure on how it's classed as 'Avengers' though. I don't think they were technically Avengers.

It was around the time that the Avenger's lost sense and also invited Wolverine, the murderenous murderer the MU has ever murdering seen, to join as well.

He was an actor in House of M but he was involved, he also was a superpowered person (people thought he was a mutant),  Civil War (he reveal his secret only for that to be retconned later), Seige (can't have Osborne without the Spider) and others, not just as an Avenger.

Far too many cross over events in recent years to count, gone are the good days when you had good writing in main books followed by 1 big event a year. Now it's make room for these 3 or 4 big events a year and spin-offs, while trying to write a good story in your own book and failing.



Hmm, pie.

Around the Network

I'll watch it since I'm a huge fan of Spider-Man. Can't say I'm happy though about another reboot so soon. Anyways Tobey Maguire was the best, Andrew Garfield is a big no no.



Send a Friend Request On PSN :P

kitler53 said:

you guys are all distracted from the most important question,..  who is casted as MJ?

she's hot.

Wait is that really who they're casting as Mary Jane? If so then I fucking approve.



kitler53 said:

you guys are all distracted from the most important question,..  who is casted as MJ?

 

she's hot.

Exactly! Why worry about Uncle Ben being shot again? We need to know who MJ is!!!



Feel bad for Andrew Garfield, perfect cast for Peter Parker yet the script wasn't strong enough.

I wish they could just continue to use him but Marvel is saying no. I can't see why Sony and Marvel can't mesh together the current story of the recent Spiderman movies with future projects so a reboot wouldn't be required. (it just sounds bad to reboot it again and again)



Around the Network
ClassicGamingWizzz said:
kitler53 said:

you guys are all distracted from the most important question,..  who is casted as MJ?

 

she's hot.

 

What a perfect couple !!! This kid is probably the new spiderman by the rumours, at first i was all in for this but the latest news about this i am not so sure with marvel getting spiderman ...

i'd fap to that child porn.



V-r0cK said:
Feel bad for Andrew Garfield, perfect cast for Peter Parker yet the script wasn't strong enough.

I wish they could just continue to use him but Marvel is saying no. I can't see why Sony and Marvel can't mesh together the current story of the recent Spiderman movies with future projects so a reboot wouldn't be required. (it just sounds bad to reboot it again and again)

I presume Marvel wanted to go a different angle. Like I said, make him a kid. Make the Avengers shocked that this kid can do more than they can dream.



Hmm, pie.

The Fury said:
V-r0cK said:
Feel bad for Andrew Garfield, perfect cast for Peter Parker yet the script wasn't strong enough.

I wish they could just continue to use him but Marvel is saying no. I can't see why Sony and Marvel can't mesh together the current story of the recent Spiderman movies with future projects so a reboot wouldn't be required. (it just sounds bad to reboot it again and again)

I presume Marvel wanted to go a different angle. Like I said, make him a kid. Make the Avengers shocked that this kid can do more than they can dream.

They probably also wanted nothing to do with Sony's Spider-Man universe. Marvel, like Nintendo, is very protective of its properties now.



Andrew Garfield is officially out so there is no maybe about it. It also looks like Andrew Garfield might never act in another movie that has Sony involved in it.