bowserthedog said:
Atheism is a belief system. If Atheism was able to answer all the questions then it would be different than a religion but it simply cant. It requires faith much like a belief in God. An Atheist must believe that God does not exist which is a belief and one that can't be proven. Athiests must take some facts that are known to base their belief on and requires faith to bridge the gap between what is known as a fact and what is not answerable. I true non belief would be to actually not formulate an opinion on whether or not God exists.
I can't speak for all religions but I do feel that the wars are caused by flawed humans and not by the religions themselves. For example what follower of Christ could wage a war based on their religous beliefs when Christ instructs not to wage wars the way the world does and is known to be a paficist and the prince of peace.
The problem is that humans are flawed and have a desire to do evil things like wage wars and will look for anything they can to justify thier actions. Religion has been abused by humans to justify many intolerable acts. And if religion didn't exists humans would merely find a different way to justify the actions they were going to take.
|
As others have pointed out. Atheism is not a system of faith. People who are Atheists do not have faith that there is no deity of any sort.
It is simply disbelief. If it cannot be proven, it is not real and therefore atheists do not believe in it. That is not faith, it is an assessment. It is just like how not all atheists will necessarily believe in the Big Bang theory, as it is just a theory. Atheists believe in what what is solid proof, not something that makes you feel better about exiting this life. It is not faith, it is based on what is definitive. If something is not proven, it is an idea, not solid proof. Atheists ask, how can it be real if it cannot be proven? It is not a question of faith, it is a question of disbelief.
I dare say there is more conflict with religion vs religion, rather than religion vs atheism.
Most conflict that arises from a religious standpoint, is when a group of people declare that their relgion better than another's religion.
This poses the question: Why cant we have religion (a) and religion (b) live in harmony?
There is always going to be argument with opposing ideals, even within said religion. Tensions have always been within a group regardless of the belief. That is why political partys argue with one another, even if they are within the same party. People argue, they try to make sense of things. Some are arrogant, some merely seek truth and philosophise on whether norms should be challanged, accepted and so forth.
It does not matter whether you are religious or atheist. Arguments will arise despite 'faith' or lack thereof.