On behalf of the White Knights of Nintendo, I want it made clear that our order deny all responsibility for Materia-Blade and do not condone his words and/or actions.
On behalf of the White Knights of Nintendo, I want it made clear that our order deny all responsibility for Materia-Blade and do not condone his words and/or actions.
| curl-6 said: On behalf of the White Knights of Nintendo, want it made clear that our order deny all responsibility for Materia-Blade and do not condone his words and/or actions. |
I don't blame you
| curl-6 said: On behalf of the White Knights of Nintendo, want it made clear that our order deny all responsibility for Materia-Blade and do not condone his words and/or actions. |
We thank you and the White Knights for your bravery in battle. *salutes*

Kane1389 said:
And then you have Ratchet and Clank Tools of Destruction, a 2007 PS3 game running at smooth 60fps with graphical fidelity matching all nintendo games you mentioned |
If you say so. LOL.
3 4K monitors isn't 12K really. It would be the same that running 2 1080p monitors and saying I'm playing at 4K. A 8K TV has 33% more pixels than 3 4K monitors, let alone a real 12K one.
Zekkyou said:
I won't disagree with you there, but Materia-Blade recently stated that "neither set of pics has an obvious winner for graphics" in regards to http://i.imgur.com/adNPXPQ.jpg (TW3 maxed on PC vs XCX), so it's not an argument you want to bother having. |
Some are simply unwilling to accept any form of defeat gracefully.
Thanks to all the chaps and chapettes who participated in this play. This thread was pure gold.
*bow*
.- -... -.-. -..
so im guessing either wii u version is cancelled or its going to be majorly delayed like watchdogs was and released when no one cares.
curl-6 said:
No. (And the following is being generous to R&C as its almost certainly a bullshot, versus a raw capture from 3D World) [images] [image] |
It's also worth noting that ToD doesn't run at a native 1280x720, and is a much less stable 60fps than 3D World. A degree of that instability is due to Insomniac having believed that hundreds of bolts on-screen at once makes things more fun than a solid 60fps (and i'd agree with them; it's one of the highlights of the Future trilogy), but even outside of those situations it's still far from a perfect lock.
I think ACiT (released 2 years later) looks a lot better than ToD did though. It wasn't a huge graphical jump over its predecessor, but they made much better use of what they had:


(Both shots seem to have had their IQ bumped, likely for marketing, but outside of that they're both in-game).

Tachikoma said:
And for more cars?
As i said, will end up being a "pretty screenshot" game and not a "i play because its fun" game. |
Well they already announced their plans for the DLC and its not going to add that many more cars since it will be just a little over 30 DLC. I'm guessing most of the DLC will be cars they wanted to have in the game in the first place. I kinda followed this game for a while and I remember the car list had over 100 cars at one point.