Probably because there are heaps of evidence that prove the moon landing was real, but conspiracy theorists ignore.  Not so much on the existence of god.

 Their is a lot of proof that the bible is wrong. You know God created Humanity/ Darwin theory etc;.


The Darwin theory is also a fact still people believe that God Created us...

Well I respect thouse christians who doesn't believe Darwin though..

Easy there cowboy, we were talking about god, not the bible or darwin, I belive in evolution... and most parts of the bible are just plain funny (and bogus IMO), still there is no way to prove or disprove god so if you belife in one (or more) or none at all is your own choice, if you choose not to belive in facts but do belive in conspiracy theorys that that makes you an idiot in my book.

 Euhm...Christians believe in god and automatically believe not in Darwin.  You can't believe in god when you believe Darwin.

And you know that the proof of the moonlanding is missing right?

Blueprints and design and development drawings of the machines involved are missing. Apollo 11 data tapes containing telemetry and the high quality video (before scan conversion) of the first moonwalk are missing

Is Robin real?

Shame-faced Brits are increasingly confusing fact and fiction when it comes to historical knowledge – that's the verdict of a compelling new study which found that most people believe that fictional figures such as King Arthur, Sherlock Holmes and Eleanor Rigby really existed.

The study, specially commissioned by UKTV Gold, tested the nation on its historical knowledge by asking 3,000 people a series of questions relating to famous factual and fictional characters. The results provide a fascinating insight into the influence that popular TV, film and fiction has had on the nation's perception of history over the last 50 years.

King Arthur, Sherlock Holmes and Robin Hood top the list of fictional characters that Brits are most likely to confuse with fact – full top ten below...

Top ten fictional characters that the British public thinks are real
1) King Arthur – 65%
2) Sherlock Holmes – 58%
3) Robin Hood – 51%
4) Eleanor Rigby – 47%
5) Mona Lisa -35%
6) Dick Turpin – 34%
7) Biggles – 33%
8) The Three Musketeers – 17%
9) Lady Godiva – 12%
10) Robinson Crusoe – 5%

King Arthur is the fictional figure most commonly mistaken for fact – incredibly almost two thirds of Brits (65%) believe that he existed and led a round table of gallant knights in the idyllic ancient Kingdom of Camelot.

Sherlock Holmes, the famous fictional detective, was so convincingly brought to life in Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's novels of the late 1880s that over half of us (58%) believe that the sleuth really lived and worked with his sidekick Watson at 22B Baker Street, North London. Half of those surveyed (51%) also believed that Robin Hood lived in Sherwood Forest during the 14th Century, robbing the rich to give to the poor.

Eleanor Rigby, made famous by the Beatles' song of the same name, is also commonly mistaken for being a real life person, with 47% believing that she was more than just a figment of John Lennon and Paul McCartney's imaginations. Confusion also surrounds the story of Dick Turpin, with over a third (34%) of respondents stating that they couldn't be sure if the notorious stage coach thief existed or not.

When it comes to real historical figures, the nation is just as confused. Nearly half of us (47%) have no idea who Richard the Lionheart was; even though the historical figure has featured in numerous films throughout the 21st Century.

The research showed that the nation's under 20s are lacking the most when it comes to basic historical knowledge. Over one fifth (21%) thought Winston Churchill, arguably Britain's most famous Prime Minister, was a work of fiction, and over a quarter (27%) thought pioneering nurse Florence Nightingale was a mythical figure.

The study notes a marked change in how people acquire their historical knowledge. Over three quarters of the nation (77%) admitted to no longer reading history books, or watching historical programmes on television (61%). One in eight (15%) admitted they rely solely on the history that they learnt at school.
Top ten historical figures that the British public thinks are myths
1) Richard the Lionheart – 47%
2) Winston Churchill – 23%
3) Florence Nightingale – 23%
4) Bernard Montgomery – 6%
5) Boudica - 5%
6) Sir Walter Raleigh – 4%
7) Duke of Wellington - 4%
8) Cleopatra - 4%
9) Gandhi – 3%
10) Charles Dickins - 3%


So Cheetos. Should I also respect an individuals right to believe that Gandhi was a fictional character?

When it come down to it pretty agreed about everything Darwin wrote was wrong. Even natural selection seems to have little if any impact in nature.

Of course this is totally off topic. The moon landing can be summed up : " One small step for man one giant bill for mankind. (American people). It was nothing but a ego trip so it really doesn't make any difference if it's real or not. The debt it cause was very real.

Umm why?  Because you say so?  Just because some people interpret the creation in the bible as different from evolution does not disprove god.  Not to mention that only even covers Christianity.

 WOW. Back that train up. you just went from unfairly comparing the lunar landing to religious beliefs, to that. Now that's a whole other can of incorrect worms. And I hate incorrect worms. They're not even good fishing bait.

 Well  I would explain them who Gandhi is.  If they still believe Gandhi is a fictional character then I will respect it.

And I will not call them idiots..

I'm curious whether there is anybody who believes that we didn't land on the moon, but do have rovers on Mars. Or do they go together (thinking both are fake)? Do those who believe we didn't land on the moon also believe that the rovers on Mars stuff has all been faked? --Darin