It would be for Crytek to go to Sony. What does Sony even need with Crytek? It's not like they don't have first party studios with amazing middleware. Crytek doesn't bring anything creatively awesome to Sony. It would be interesting for Sony to own a multiplat engine they can try to pimp out to 3rd parties. But what does Cry Engine really bring that 3rd parties can't already get from UE4 and other middleware engines.Maybe Sony is worried MS will buy Epic which would make UE a MS property and so Sony thinks it needs a multiplat engine of its own as a counterbalance.

This would be the better thing to do. It would allow the IP to pick up ground in this gen of consoles.

majority of the remasters arent necessary  D:

It sure does. Nobody cared about Crysis 2 when it released. A standalone remake would be DOA. A collection may sell better, but still wouldn't do good numbers.  

I only want a remaster of 1. I give two craps about 2 and 3. They stopped caring about Nomad. I stopped caring about the other games.

I've always thought that engines were the hidden battleground for quality on consoles.

2 wasn't exactly a stellar piece compared to 1, after Crytek went to consoles the series just took a nosedive in quality and general play, I really don't see a reason for them to remaster just the 2nd game and even then it will flop.

Crytek should have just stayed where it started from and pandered to it's original audience since the majority of that audience is no longer interested in what they do anymore.

Out of all games, why would Crytek remake Crysis 2? Wouldn't Ryse be the obvious option? Or a Crysis collection?

Any remastered game is not necessary in general.

This seems this is going to be the port-generation