I am fine with that but what about the infinite speed belief? That's not based on any science, point me in that way or explain further your belief. If infinite speed was possible, you'd be everywhere at once at the same time. Then again I am thinking isn't this what they say about quantum mechanics you can be everywhere in the universe at once until locked down by observation to location such as where we are now earth as there are so many observers now. So is the question are we infinite beings everywhere at once until observation makes us go through on of the infinite slits the the experiment like light particle photon in double slit when observed goes through one but when not observed goes through both at the same time like a  wave. As Sheldon Cooper would say "it's a wave" of course the opposite is true that we are not moving at all nor travelling at speed for that would be impossible but a series of static photos that look like movement.

too bad your bible is not the original bible, if your bible is still the original one then there will be no contradiction with science, you will find the original one already inside Holly Qur'an. and Holly Qur'an don't have any contradiction with scientific "fact".

I already disproven that because it moves around me while I'm stationary.

I don't think there is much point explaining, I think the point of this thread is to hope a few ignorant non-theists click on a few of the links and listen to what sound like sensible logical explanations refuting complex science that they don't currently understand. The best thing to do unfortunately is lock the thread or not post so it dissapears into the internets own version of the aether.

Bullshit. That's the worst thing to do, there's absolutely nothing wrong with alternative points of view.

In fact, I applaud OoSnap for at least taking all modern theories of science with a grain of salt.  I've always seen Science as sloppy because nothing in itself is absolute, just close to certain.  There's literally paradox at every corner and competing theories for EVERYTHING.  I'm not a bible humper and don't go to church, but I do find merit in challenging modern conceptions especially in this day and age where everythings seemingly done with an agenda or to make a quick buck.  

The worst he does here is offer another point of view on a subject we were all taught growing up. This kind of critical thinking challenges what the majority of us percieve. There's nothing wrong with that at all and I can't believe you're so quick to ridicule something that you clearly haven't looked into personally.

Information is never ever a bad thing and I'd rather sit here and observe what he has to say before making a judgement based on what I've been told by OTHER strangers.  Fact is we as humans can't prove or disprove shit. You only have your own reality to go off of and that's as far as it goes. I'm interested to hear all sorts of points of view so this thread certainly has merit.

The Earth is flat too.

Read up on Foucault's pendulum.

Proof earth rotates.

And unless you think the mars rover is a big consiracy, there's your proof the heliocentric model, with our understanding of gravity and orbital mechanics, is the correct once.

The only scientific evidence I can find the Earth is spinning is Foucault's Pendulum but that can be accounted for in a geocentric model: 

"If one rotates the shell relative to the fixed stars about an axis going through its center, a Coriolis force arises in the interior of the shell, that is, the plane of a Foucault pendulum is dragged around" - Albert Einstein, cited in "Gravitation", Misner Thorne and Wheeler pp. 544-545. 

"...Thus we may return to Ptolemy's point of view of a 'motionless earth'...One has to show that the transformed metric can be regarded as produced according to Einstein's field equations, by distant rotating masses. This has been done by Thirring. He calculated a field due to a rotating, hollow, thick-walled sphere and proved that inside the cavity it behaved as though there were centrifugal and other inertial forces usually attributed to absolute space. Thus from Einstein's point of view, Ptolemy and Corpenicus are equally right." - Max Born, "Einstein's Theory of Relativity", Dover Publications, 1962, pp 344 & 345. 

A June 25, 1913 letter from Einstein to Ernst Mach* concerning such forces from a relativistic point of view: 

"[Y]our happy investigations on the foundations of mechanics, Planck's unjustified criticism notwithstanding, will receive brilliant confirmation. For it necessarily turns out that inertia originates in a kind of interaction between bodies, quite in the sense of your considerations on Newton's pail experiment. The first consequence is on p. 6 of my paper. The following additional points emerge:*(1) If one accelerates a heavy shell of matter S, then a mass enclosed by that shell experiences an accelerative force. (2) If one rotates the shell relative to the fixed stars about an axis going through its center, a Coriolis force arises in the interior of the shell, that is, the plane of a Foucault pendulum is dragged around.

*In the Ptolemaic system, the earth is considered to be at rest and without rotation in the center of the universe, while the sun, other planets and fixed stars rotate around the earth. In relational mechanics this rotation of distant matter yields the force ... Now the gravitational attraction of the sun is balanced by a real gravitational centrifugal force due to the annual rotation of distant masses around the earth (with a component having a period of one year). In this way the earth can remain at rest and at an essentially constant distance from the sun. The diurnal rotation of distant masses around the earth (with a period of one day) yields a real gravitational centrifugal force flattening the earth at the poles. Foucault’s pendulum is explained by a real Coriolis force acting on moving masses over the earth’s surface ...The effect of this force will be to keep the plane of oscillation of the pendulum rotating together with the fixed stars. 

- Andre K. T. Assis, professor of physics at the University of Campinas - UNICAMP, in Brazil) Relational Mechanics, pp. 190-191 

I have altered the OP to make more "clean".

Of course they are in a waltz, the whole solar system is, the whole galaxy is. Everything is revolving around a larger celestial body or going in the direction of one. The universe isnt static. Right now our whole galaxy is moving. The drawing wich show you planets and moons going on a perfect circle are meant to let you understand it better. Everything is always in constant movement. And while it is accurate that they revolve around the planet or the star, they are also constantly moving in a different axis.

The moon's orbit beeing centered in something like the mantle is not suprising. The moon has been been getting farther from the earth with time to the point it will be lost to space one day. Maybe it will become a new planet if its orbit stabilises. The earth orbital force just isnt enough to keep it within reach.

And no, the earth does not revolve in a center point. The Earth is in the outer arms of the milky way. The earth revolves around the Sun and the Sun revolves around the massive gravitational force in the middle of the galaxy believed to be a super massive black hole. That is the only point you could make a case on, but the galaxy itself is moving aswell so even that isnt the case.

There is absolutely no way that the earth is standing still, wich makes it impossible for it to be in the center of the universe unless they whole universe moved in the same proportion with it, and i dont see how that could even be possible without some magical/god like beeing that is far from beeing proven as something real. And really, i can garantee to you that nothing that convenient exists. We are not special, the earth is not special. There are millions of earths across the universe and no reason to believe our is special. Our own earth will be destroyed in time. Humanity probably extinguished unless we discover nuclear fusion and can achieve interstellar travel. There is nothing so gentle as a special place and a special existance. Thats just how it is.

Its worth noting that the solar system is supposidly parallel to the center of the galaxy and that is why we cant look at the center of the milky way.