By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Why is soccer so unpopular in the US?

^ not to mention all the south american/ african kids who play it and gather around one tv to watch a game.

soccer can be played anywhere at anytime. if your some poor kid from argentina you just get a couple of friends and make a ball out of some cheap shit like rubberbands or w/e. then you use 2 stones for posts then u have a game!

in grade 8 i used to play soccer in teh winter on falteend snow and ice with my friends at recess.



Around the Network
Dianko said:
fagarcia75 said:
Soccer was not in any of the public schools as a competivie sport that I attended as a youth (Houston, Texas).

There is a sports radio guy here in the Northwest, and he is hilarious to listen to when he starts his rants on soccer. His premise always seems to center around the idea of "soccer is for the 5' 6" guys who weren't big and strong enough to play football, basket ball, or baseball.

He is especially funny when people call in about the U.S. soccer world cup teams. Callers try and defend our little 5' 6" forwards with the argument that they are talented. The radio hosts chimes in with so are the European players, but they are also 6' 6" and so on.

His basic argument is right as far as I'm concened. In the U.S. the biggest strongest guys go the the NFL, NBA and MLB; soccer picks up the leftovers.

 You seriously never played soccer in school? I played it in middle school and high school, and alot of indoor play at my university. Almost everyone I know has played some soccer, especially at middle school or in leagues when they were kids (regardless of gender).


We played kickball.  In freshman (high school) gym class we played soccer for maybe a week at the most.  Noone knew what they were doing (except for one asian kid who could fly all over the place with that ball). 

In my neighborhood that I grew up in I can think of only two guys who liked soccer: Matt (white) and Alex (Mexican)

At the church that I grew up in only one person I knew off liked soccer; he was from Checkloslavakia.

Soccer was just not present in our school systems while I was growing up (I am 32).  I did begin to become more present once I finished high school though.  And I think that that school district has soccer games now.

*On a side note:  Out of the four sports (basketball, baseball, football, and soccer)  Soccer seems to be the only sport were parents at kids leagues don't behave like spoiled, immature, big-mouthed, brats.



Becaue American' are signifficantly less intelligent than Euopean. It's a well known fact, American education is an abomination.



ubluey said:
Becaue American' are signifficantly less intelligent than Euopean. It's a well known fact, American education is an abomination.

Close the door on your way out.



Dogs Rule said:
@Twestern Alright. Texas might be the exeption to the rule. Perhaps it is even the exeption that prompted the NHL to try a southern expansion project. Last I heard Phoenix was a pretty tough sell. A desert should not have a team. @Cheetos: I agree about the national team. If they had a shot at the World cup, then the sport would take off. To get that shot, the team would have to be massively funded and supported. I don't know who would make that investment, it wouldn't be the government that's for sure.

 


 Hockey is more popular in North Carolina than college football, if that says anything.



Around the Network
ubluey said:
Becaue American' are signifficantly less intelligent than Euopean. It's a well known fact, American education is an abomination.

Funny. I wonder how many B.As are shared by players on a given national soccer team versus the Indianapolis Colts or New England Patriots.

And aside from that, what about countries like Japan where soccer isn't at a fevor pitch like Europe and such?

Maybe it's me, but I like my diversity in sports: I'd rather not have people rioting over soccer, and prefer a more diversified group of sports.



Back from the dead, I'm afraid.

ubluey said:
Becaue American' are signifficantly less intelligent than Euopean. It's a well known fact, American education is an abomination.

 lol. if your so smart, why cant you spell *Because* and Americans right?

 

your and embarassment to Europeans.

Im Canadian what does that make me? 



mrstickball said:
Bark - as for Basketball and NASCAR:

People (Americans) like basketball because atleast there is some action, thanks to the shot clock. Although many games have wayyy too many fouls, atleast the teams actually score, and there is alot of do-or-die play going on, rather than 100 missed shots, and 1-2 scores.

As for NASCAR (which I don't get myself): it's the thrill of possibly wrecking, and the elegance of 2 cars speeding at 200 miles an hour, using cars similar to the one outside in your garage, speeding within inches of eachother. It's also the fights (ever watch UFC? That's becoming popular stuff), and again, the wrecks.

The shot clock is probably the best invention in the history of basketball.  It is hard to imagine a game where the score was 19-18 Pistons vs Laker, but that happened in the 50's.

 Fights are popular in every county.  What is really sad is the decline of boxing.  There isn't much talent in any of the divisions and most of the bouts are decided before the men enter the ring.  I worry that the UFC will eventually go that route, but that is another story.   

In general, Americans love violence.  It doesn't even have to be real violence as Wrestling is still popular. 



^ you know soccer has some of the nastiest injuries \?

look at beckham and rooney. there metatarsels got fucked up badly.

in soccer u get kicked all over your legs and sometimes nasty players (i do this at times as well) even dig into your thighs with their cleates.



One thing that people fail to consider, American sports (generally) are inflated when it comes to the amount of action.

For instance a touch down is worth 7 (really only 6 but if you consider a chip shot from 20 yards action a hard task...) a field goal in basketball (why in basketball is a shot considered a field goal?) is worth 2 (excluding 3 pointers.)

so if a football game ends 14-7 it was really only 2-1.
basketball in a game that 100-80 is really only (about) 90 total scores.

i know the math isn't perfect but when people say that football is high scoring...not really. sure it can be 28-7, which is really only 4-1, but is that high scoring? 5 goals in the span of 3-4 hours...yet in soccer in an 1 1/2 hours you can have the same about of points, give or take.

basketball is high scoring, but generally american sports are inflated by fictitious point scale. (except for baseball)

just something to consider.