I think blood borne will get an 85 Metacritic minimum hopefully 90
Ltd predictions by the time 9th Gen comes out
Ps4:110million
Xbox one :75 million( was 65)
Wii u: 20 milliion
I think blood borne will get an 85 Metacritic minimum hopefully 90
Ltd predictions by the time 9th Gen comes out
Ps4:110million
Xbox one :75 million( was 65)
Wii u: 20 milliion
If it doesn't, I will P-PB my account.
lol @ smeared. The Order is a bad game. That's why it got most of the scores it got. "Smear" implies another motive.
Yes. It will get low scores because it didn't change a whole lot.
Lawlight said: Yes. It will get low scores because it didn't change a whole lot. |
In a way I can actually see reviewers going "No groundbreaking innovations", "More of the same soul games", "Too different from souls-series", "You die too often", "It´s too easy compared to xy"...now that´s obviously exaggerated but seriously I doubt it will review too well (no matter it´s quality) so I´d guess 80-85 on Meta with at least 1 "professional" giving it a 5/10 ><
|
|
Yup...RO friggin rocked |
Shinobi-san said: Smear campaign...wow do i disagree with that term being thrown around. Fans might get out of hand, but i dont think the media has any agenda when it comes to reviews unless they are paid to give a good review. If the game turns out bad it will get bad word of mouth like the Order. That doesn't mean everyone thought the Order was bad...just that most people did. |
wut. Have you been reading reviews over the past year or so?
TruckOSaurus said:
A smear campaign implies that reviewers were wilfully trying to trash The Order without any basis in reality. That's not exactly what happened, the flaws pointed out in the previews of The Order are truly present in the game and for some reviewers that was enough to drop the score down. An example of smearing a game would be people who say The Last of Us is nothing but an interactive movie. That's simply not true. |
ok but they said the same thing about the Order and yet I remember an awful lot of long gameplay sequences in it.
Ruler said:
WILL BLOODBORNE BE SMEARED LIKE THE ORDER: 1886?
http://www.onlysp.com/will-bloodborne-be-smeared-like-the-order-1886/
After the dust settles some of the cooler heads are prevailing to prove “major” sources like IGN jumped the gun on subjective reviews for The Order: 1886. So the single player story driven shooter has proven to be worth the price of admission for true SP lovers. There can be no question though, the smear campaign against the game prior to release was gigantic and effective in undercutting its success and achievements. In ascertaining whether or not Bloodborne will receive the same treatment we have to examine the similarities and differences between the two games and how they are portrayed in the media. Similarities: both were vying for the title of elite, must-play PS4 exclusive. Thus far no PS4 exclusive game on offer has been accepted as solidly 9-10 material. The new Killzone was mediocre, infamous: Second Son was pretty but dialed back franchise staples and variety, and Driveclub turned out just pretty good. Now The Order has dropped onto us and while riveting, still doesn’t scream must buy. Bloodborne now has a shot at the coveted spot, and with it the flood of sales and glory of potentially being a system seller. One thing that stands in the way of this is its status as a Souls series successor from From Software. Souls fans are numerous and toothy but the bulk of gamers want nothing more than a minor challenge while these games are known to present a serious bout with the mental stability of the player. On the one hand having the Souls following with it and the respect of critics from those previous games Bloodborne may well command enough respect to avoid the hate machine that targeted The Order. On the other hand if the game is tweaked to appeal to the aforementioned masses (and there is some indication it might) we could even see a revolt from fans and critics that kickstarts a grass roots hater rampage. That would be in opposition to the top-down hate approach that besmirched The Order, but would be no less effective. It would also offer something new to attack the PS4 exclusive with, a different kind of ammo to rationalize another pitchfork tour. It will likely be essentially linear, which blew the hats off critics of The Order but there’s a kind of built-in RPG-ness to these games that dislodges that linear feeling so that could prove a non-issue. Bloodborne probably won’t be as short (especially with the deaths) as The Order so nobody can have a fit over a 7-12 hour campaign on its account. So far the odds are good that Bloodborne will avoid a smear campaign. Coming at the end of March though, it will be riding the tide of releases by Sony that just haven’t fared all that well, putting extra pressure on the game to deliver something special. People are looking for a game to define the generation and what should be new about it, The Order proved that gameplay from last generation isn’t good enough. I fear the gameplay of Bloodborne won’t re-invent the wheel either. To their credit, From Software is playing their cards closer to their chest than Ready At Dawn. There hasn’t been a ton of footage of Bloodborne for crowds to begin to latch their claws onto. When push comes to shove I think Bloodborne has enough going for it creatively and enough clout behind the developer to avoid the kind of smear campaign that Ready At Dawn was subjected to. If it doesn’t deliver on a lot of hopes though, it could earn post release hate tributaries throughout the gaming community. OnlySP will keep you tuned in to what Bloodborne has to offer in its campaign, hate free. |
Delicious, delicious games.
The Order got the scores it deserved based off the issues it had, so there's really was no smear campaign from the media... Bloodborne on the other hand is a completely different game that shows far more promise in the way it's been presented itself thus far.
Current gaming platforms - Switch, PlayStation 4, Xbox One, Wii U, New 3DS, PC
outlawauron said:
wut. Have you been reading reviews over the past year or so? |
I have. Of the reviewers that i read i dont find them to have an obvious agenda when it comes to certain games. Naturally i read the review sites that i trust and a bit beyond that as well. Theres just nothing concrete for me to base it on.
Reviewers are simply average gamers in most cases. The average gamer likes what most people like and dislikes what most people dislike. I really dont think The Order had a smear campaign against it and i dont think reviewers have some sort of agenda. Certain reviewers get paid off to keep the scores respectable but thats about it imo.