I dont see how Bloodborne wont get good scores. Game looks very good.

Bloodborne as "essentially linear"? Is there something I don't know about Bloodborne, because the souls series had a lot of backtracking and splitting routes.

If you are going to reply to me, at least counter what I am saying... T_T  I don't need to play it directly to have that knowledge about the game. 

and no one will be hating on Bloodborne like The Order. 

I haven't played the order yet, but i'm sure if bloodborne will have any complains it won't be from being a single player, short experience with not good enough gameplay.

Maybe it won't sell as much as dark souls, thought i suspect it will move consoles as there's a very enthusiastic community around the souls franchise with no other way to play this game other than getting a ps4.

I, for one, have already taken some days off from work to focus on this game when it comes out next month.

Smear campaign...wow do i disagree with that term being thrown around. Fans might get out of hand, but i dont think the media has any agenda when it comes to reviews unless they are paid to give a good review.

If the game turns out bad it will get bad word of mouth like the Order. That doesn't mean everyone thought the Order was bad...just that most people did.

I already countered, with knowledge from playing the game, not regurgitating the troll material that goes around.

As for hating, you can count on me for hating on Bloodborne. Disgusting game that I wouldn't even claim if free on PS+.

Not a chance.

Thanks for reminding me. I just ordered the collectors edition on amazon.

It probabbly will get a good score what if its really below what the game deserves? like just an 80? Bloodborne looks like a 10 to me or 9.5

Frankly, I hope it does, for the simple reason to render Reviewers even more irrelevant among the average consumer.