No! Hell no! it's a new game made by the creator of Demon's and Dark souls, two consecrated series! Absolutely amazing gameplay, deep story, multiplayer, jus amazing games whit a score of 8.9 - 9.1! For real dude, i'm, and most gamers, are expecting at the very least to 8.0 from Bloodborne, my money goes for 9.0 since this game is looking gorgeous!

7.0? no, not in hell! I even dare to say that Bloodborne will have the best score for a "next gen. only exclusive" to date, will hit more than 8.7+ for sure!

Nope it did not, not at all.

That's the thing about opinions, we've all got one.

Yeah, but the thing is, most of you guys haven't even played the game yet have formed opinions about the game already. And that goes for you too.

Well user reviews and meta seem to agree that the game isn't very good, I mean so many people can't all be wrong can they? I'll pick up the game when it's in the bargain bin like I've always said.

Metacritic scores for this game don't matter. This game was always going to get poor reviews regardless of how it was going to be. I was saying this all along. The hate that this game garners is astounding. It was never trying to be a typical TPS yet its reviewed on the same terms. Its more like a Gears Of War, Resistance and Heavy Rain mashup, and a very good one at that.

Also, the "user reviews" you are saying, are probably mostly from fanboys either loving too much or mostly hating too much on this game. I can't believe people actually consider those user reviews, so many good games have terrible user reviews due to general hate on the internet.

As for that bargain bin thing, by the time its price drops that low you'll probably forget about it anyways.

Well I look at Amazon user reviews for the most part and exclusive games don't get that many negative reviews for the. Even a game like Knack that got a meh meta still has a 4.1 user review on Amazon. So I'm not sure what you're saying really applies to every game, I mean it could just be that the game is actually pretty bad. 

Oh, if only it hadn't been proved time and time and time again that user reviews mean jack shit and that the meta is driven by anything except any sort of journalistic integrity.

I honestly can't understand how people can still put any stock into internet "articles" at this point in time.

Ummm I wasn't referring to user reviews on Meta, I was referring to Amazon user reviews, some are going to be troll reviews. hopefully those would be obvious enough for anyone to immediately dismiss them in considering the game, but it's not like meta where all the troll fanboys go to post reviews just because it's an exclusive.  

So based on what I've read from people that have actually bought the game and played it the game isn't very good, sorry to say not everything Sony touches turns into gold. 

People knew about the problems The Order 1886 was having long before the game came out. The team developing that game went from hack and slash games on the PSP to Third Person shooters on the PS4 while the people behind Blood-borne know what their doing.

It would be very surprising if Blood-borne was not even close to Dark Souls and Demon Souls in Quality.

Blood-Borne looks great on a technical level, has a new style that is both different enough to be unique but still retains that Dark Souls atmosphere, combat is still hard but switches from defending to dodging and the team behind the game is solid.