By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Sony Santa Monica designer threatens future ad revenue and review copies of games in retaliation of low The Order scores

radha said:
generic-user-1 said:


im for no gaming adds on gamemedia sites, but that that doesnt change that gawkr is a company run by retarded monkeys.

and crying over bad reviews is just stupid. make it like uwe boll, fight em like a man.

(disclaimer, the order isnt as badly written or funny as a boll movie)


But why are reviews bad for games and not for movies? I say is becuase of the financial risk, and that is why there is so much whining on the developers/publishers, well why cant we, consumer be protected from OUR financial risk? I dont want to wasted US$60 on a bad game when there are better options out there. Reviews are always a suggestion and consumers used to protect their investment, anyone complaining agaisnts reviews is complaining because he/she is being financially affected.

And were your friends so disapointed at the game they would rate it 2/10?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network

My playtime was minus the cutscenes. I found Bayonetta 2 shorter than Bayonetta 1. Vanquish on the other hand was a very short game with little to no story. Not saying I didn't enjoy them as I specially bought the WiiU for Bayonetta 2 and bought vanquish on launch and I'm a huge fan of PG. 



DonFerrari said:
radha said:


But why are reviews bad for games and not for movies? I say is becuase of the financial risk, and that is why there is so much whining on the developers/publishers, well why cant we, consumer be protected from OUR financial risk? I dont want to wasted US$60 on a bad game when there are better options out there. Reviews are always a suggestion and consumers used to protect their investment, anyone complaining agaisnts reviews is complaining because he/she is being financially affected.

And were your friends so disapointed at the game they would rate it 2/10?

Well those that feel ripped off think is so bad they want their money back, to me that equals a 0/10.



dd if = /dev/brain | tail -f | grep games | nc -lnvvp 80

Hey Listen!

https://archive.org/details/kohina_radio_music_collection

Who cares?! I wanna see opinion! D:



I honestly thought The Order 1886 was a pretty good movie. Bit pricy though.



This is the Game of Thrones

Where you either win

or you DIE

Around the Network

I support this. In fact they should do a complete media blackout. No interviews, no preview code, no review copies. Just blog posts, youtube videos and TV ads.



radha said:
DonFerrari said:

And were your friends so disapointed at the game they would rate it 2/10?

Well those that feel ripped off think is so bad they want their money back, to me that equals a 0/10.


If I were to get my money back on all games I don't like then give 0 I would save a lot of money and a bunch of games would score 0

 

Can I see the receipts of the purchases of your disgrunted friends?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."