I've been thinking about this for a while. Has it ever occurred to you that Ezio's death scene in Assassin's Creed is impossible even within the game's logic?

The characters are able to relive past lives because of memories passed on through genes. Well, then who the fuck extracted semen from Ezio's lukewarm dead body and put it in her vagina so that the memory could be passed on? AC characters should not "exist" past their last child...

Any other examples of inconsistencies, things that bug you, or toilet thinking in general?

I don't think they expect you to think about this like that. ^_^

That's why I titled the thread "let's overanalyse games", lol. It still bugs me though.

How come The Courier survived two shots to the head and being buried alive while bleeding to death?

It is taking every ounce of willpower in me not to say, "Your mom."

Benny's gun had low condition.

How in the hell could Chris push and punch a boulder that's heavier, bigger and rougher than him? Even with gloves, his hands should've been destroyed.

Hes stronger and there is something called exstinct

The game should have REALLY ditched the Scy-Fy part. Less convoluted storyline and no problems without non-linear sequels.

The genetic memory of his death wouldn't be passed on in that case.

I'm pretty sure Ezio's genes were distributed quite extensively throughout Italy.