By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Ben Stein to take on Darwinism on April 18

Smidlee said:
Sqrl said:
 

Good call, obviously there can only ever be a single species trying to evolve.

 

edit:

I predict that this Sunday people will go to Church..and by your logic if they do it proves that god doesn't exist.

Just predicting that people will do something, or find something doesn't prove or disprove anything. And one species evolving does not preclude another species from evolving.

 


Neither does slapping together a butch of bones and make up a story proves or disproves anything.


And if all they had done was slap together bones you would have a point. But you don't know that that is what they did at all. You simply believe it because it is conveniant to your position. Or are you now claiming to have personally taken part in some sort of in-depth review of this case and have personally found factual reasoning for your conclusion? Can you even cite someone who has?

 It would seem fair that if I cite someone who has found and presented evidence to the scientific community for this case, that you could find someone who has presented evidence against it if you wish to dismiss its validity.  Unless you just wish to challenge science as a whole?

 



To Each Man, Responsibility
Around the Network

@ rocketpig
"most of the time resulting in the animal dying at birth or shortly thereafter because it can't compete with the rest of its kind"

Just like the poor frog baby and snake baby from AOA thread the other day. Either they were random defects that occurs from time to time, or god is an a$$hole.



Smidlee said:
rocketpig said:
Wow. Just wow. The rampant ignorance in this thread is breath-taking. I'm getting the hell out of here before I go crazy.

Creationists still exist? Really? I thought we were past this sort of silliness.
Someone not knowing creationist still exist and knowing that some have a very sound mind is a statement of ignorance itself, is it not?

 


Sarcasm FTW.

I have no problem with people believing in Creationism, it's their right to believe whatever they like.

What I want Creationists to admit is that their entire argument is based on faith and faith alone. Evolution only piles more and more evidence in its corner as research into genetics improves. But, most importantly, it's based on the solid foundation of science where nothing is sacred and contrary information is not only welcomed, but often ends up changing the scientific community. Science is the antithesis to faith and one is the quest for knowledge while the other constrains it.




Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/

mmnin said:
have you "seen" this process happen rocketpig? other than "it makes sense in theory with associative evidence."

I've also never seen a fusion reaction in the Sun but I don't see many people arguing whether it's happening or not.




Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/

"Whats the worst that can happen anyway? If I die, and I am wrong, I die like everyone else. Yet if I am right, I will go to heaven while the darwinist will go to hell. The irony is suffocating."

So just because they have diffreent beliefs than you they get to perpetually suffer for all of eternity while you get paradise. Wait, what if they still managed to live more rightous lives than you despite their beliefs? Do they still go to hell?

Doesn't sound like a god I would want to believe in at all. In fact sounds like a tyrant that needs to be deposed.

What happened to the all-knowing, all-loving, all-forgiving christian god that christians are supposed to believe in? How did he get replaced by the spiteful tyrant king of the old-testament?

 



Around the Network
Paul said:
@ rocketpig
"most of the time resulting in the animal dying at birth or shortly thereafter because it can't compete with the rest of its kind"

Just like the poor frog baby and snake baby from AOA thread the other day. Either they were random defects that occurs from time to time, or god is an a$$hole.

 You mean frogbaby isn't proof of intelligent design?



To Each Man, Responsibility
Bursche said:
What I find the most amusing between Darwinists and Creationists (and Im a creationist btw) is that many Darwinists get hell bent over proving the Creationists wrong. They are beliefs, we all have different ones, yet why argue over something like this, you wont change anyone's mind.

One really funny thing to me is beliefs in the afterlife of the two. Lets say you are a Darwinist, what will happen when you die? Nothing. Now a creationist, you go to heaven or hell. What a battle. I really see the only motivation for Darwinists to prove themselves correct because they dont want anyone else having hope in continuation after this world.

Whats the worst that can happen anyway? If I die, and I am wrong, I die like everyone else. Yet if I am right, I will go to heaven while the darwinist will go to hell. The irony is suffocating.

why is it that christians always assume their beliefs are the right ones? what if you're wrong and the only real god is allah, or krisha, or even quetzalcoatl... then you didn't just not believe in a god you believed in the wrong god... you better hope the real god isn't the jealous type ;)



Rath said:
mmnin said:
have you "seen" this process happen rocketpig? other than "it makes sense in theory with associative evidence."

Have you seen the movement of tectonic plates mmnin? other than "it makes sense in theory with associative evidence."

 

Things that take a long time are observed through long term predictions and through looking at past evidence. Evolution hardly happens overnight and only ever happens on a mass and fast scale after massive extinctions. Which happily humans look to be causing sometime in the next couple of hundred years, maybe we will be observing evolution sooner than we'd like.

 


What we know as fact is what we have seen to be true. Believe in God or not, that is an argument written off because the multiple other possibilities mixed with a mass of population who have not experienced any form of God led the accepted trend against it. However, if you cannot see evolution because it does take a long time, or rather a rare occurence over a short time, to show true, then isn't that just as not seeing God? Claiming Evolution in its extreme form as anything more than a theory is just as ignorant a stance. With as much as we have yet to learn, is there not any possibilities that could have existed in our past, unobserved and unrealized, that could lay way to much that we see used today in support of evolution, though falsely so?




he is insane about this. he thinks that random chance led to all things as they are. he is so wrong. it is guided chance. if life can spring up once, it can probably spring up multiple times and i would bet that we are not evolved from the first life on this planet. the first life probably died almost immediately.

not only that, but he uses reverse chance. take a deck of cards and deal all of tehm out and record the order. Then shuffle and repeat. Take a hundred years to try and get those first 52 cards again. u will fail. how many times did u get it? once, the first time. the chances of you getting it again border on impossible, yet cards are not impossible. using the same logic, the first deal of cards shouldnt exist.



my pillars of gaming: kh, naughty dog, insomniac, ssb, gow, ff

i officially boycott boycotts.  crap.

I can believe whatever I want! I believe that you're stupid and what you believe is stupid and you should die! Whoa whoa, don't use science to prove me wrong. Science needs facts, and I only need faith. You can't prove faith wrong, so I'm right. Erego, die in a fire.

That's directed at everybody on both sides. Really, go die. I'm right. But believe whatever you want.