Not being at 60fps compromises the player experience. Come on ND. Geez.

cause they cant :x

As long as the visuals shown in the PS meeting last month are the standard for the game, I'm totally fine with it.

I played all previous games in the franchise on 30fps and was very pleased with it.

agree, if it was a hack n slash game or something like Zone of the Enders then 60 would be needed, but not in this game.

if we can trade the 60FPS for something technically impresive that would improve the "experience" then fine by me.

I just wish they would be honest and say they probably can't do it instead of giving us one of these bullshit Ubisoft excuses.

It's weird so many here are heralding Uncharted 4 for technical greatness when it's a confirmed 37 FPS. Seems like any other game that doesn't achieve 60 FPS we mock it for being technically weak.

Don't get me wrong. UC4 looks amazing.

i've got nothing against 60 fps but i can't tell the difference enough to care. if dropping to 30 means more stuff on screen i'd rather have 30. just make sure it's stable because i notice dips in framerate much moreso than 60 vs 30.

45fps would be ok too.

It's basically visuals vs. performance... And ND feels that the visuals and effects add a far greater value to their game than the increased performance that 60fps would offer. It's the type of compromise all developers have to make. It's disappointing that these compromises have to be made in the first place though.

OMFG THANK GOD. Seriously, playing MGS Ground Zeroes with all those texture pop ins is just not fucking worth it. I would have so wanted to play MGSGZ on 30fps with graphics enhanced.