| Aeolus451 said: That's a good bit of people. Back to the topic, Ubisoft is another I think deserves the title of most overrated developer. |
Even when we discuss if they're the worst developer of all time here on VGC? They must be REALLY bad then! 
Golly. Seems like it's impossible to state a disparaging remark about Nintendo without being tarred and feathered...
Troll_Whisperer said:
You're perfectly entitled to that opinion, but what R* games would you say are glitchfests? They are famous for the opposite actually, for open world standards their games are surprisingly glitch-free. The only game I can think of that had some glaring glitches is RDR, and even those were rare. |
RDR at release was literally a glitch storm. I don't know if you were on the internet during its release but the only gameplay that was shared were videos with glitches but they were considered ''funny'' only because Rockstar made the game. Also when I was a kid I sometimes visited friends who played a lot of GTA and I can't remember much more than ''Lets use this glitch to do this...''. However, I do not play any Rockstar game so I have little to no experience with GTA, RDR and Bully etc, but this is the impression I got from them over the years.
Probably Rockstar for me, but then again I'm not a fan of GTA or sandbox games in general. I'll be playing RDR soon so we'll see how that goes.
Runners-up are Rocksteady and Bethesda.
NNID: TheCCluc
Naughty Dog tbh. They are good, but they gained such a fame that people cant see the issues their games have.
padib said:
I think you might want to look up the definition of "convincing". It might help explain why people aren't agreeing with you. |
Except for the other 20 people who stated the same thing he did before and after him.
Ka-pi96 said:
What would a list do? I'm not saying they are a bad developer, far from it in fact. I'm saying they are overrated. The incredibly ardent support they get from their fans is why they are overrated. Their fans anticipate their upcoming games to such a huge extent and rave about their existing games calling them the best games ever and the best developer ever as much as they can. But that opinion isn't the majority, therefore they are overrated (like many other developers) but to a larger extent than the others. |
Pretty much this. They are not bad, but when someone says their games are the best games in existence, that's just an opinion and not everyone agrees to it. I personally liked Nintendo better at the fourth generation. I've played Super Mario Galaxy, and I just don't see the charm from the SMW days.
Ka-pi96 said:
I think you might want to look up objectively in a dictionary, you aren't using it correctly. |
Umm, Their games ARE objectively of the highest quality. Nintendo games have the least bugs and most stable framerates compared to other devs.
padib said:
It could be but the more intelligent disagree with you. |
So the people who agree with you are intelligent and those who don't are inferior?
Can we just lock this thread already?
It's one giant clusterfuck that shows no sign of ever improving.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
Currently Online 
