By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Day 1 AAA titles you will buy in 2015 ?

Bloodborne
MGSV
MLB the Show 15
Uncharted 4
No Man's Sky
Batman Arkham Knight
FIFA 16



Around the Network

Halo 5

Quantum Break

Treyarch's next Call of Duty.



Proud to be a Californian.

If i have the money at the time: Bloodborne, GTAV PC, MGS V.

If I finish the prequels by then: Witcher 3.

Buying but not rush for a day 1: Uncharted 4, No Man's Sky, FFXV, Wild, Arkham Knight.



4 ≈ One

fiercedeity said:
JazzB1987 said:

If what you want to say is something like:
Nintendo is to Super Bowl finals what most other devs are to a PE football game in a primary school.
Then I agree 100%


And NO Nintendo games should NOT drop in price. Devaluation of ones own product is the worst thing you can do.
I dont care about any game that drops in price because it has no value to me. If a dev does not think the own product has any value why should anyone pay full price for it? There is a reason why I have hundreds of games on steam. I just wait for every game to drop to 1-10 bucks then I buy it.

I have no problem if EVERY single game would start to be sold for 29.99. But I have a big problem with "losing" money just because a game is 33% off 1 week after release or 50% off 2 months after release.  Why punish me for supporting them? Playing early means nothing to me (especially in times where DLC is a thing) I am a patient person. I am still waiting for my GTA5 on PC.


Switch the metaphor and you're right. Nintendo is just greedy.  also what a straw man. I'm not talking about a week or a couple of months.

No, the metaphor is spot on.



bigtakilla said:
fiercedeity said:
JazzB1987 said:

If what you want to say is something like:
Nintendo is to Super Bowl finals what most other devs are to a PE football game in a primary school.
Then I agree 100%


And NO Nintendo games should NOT drop in price. Devaluation of ones own product is the worst thing you can do.
I dont care about any game that drops in price because it has no value to me. If a dev does not think the own product has any value why should anyone pay full price for it? There is a reason why I have hundreds of games on steam. I just wait for every game to drop to 1-10 bucks then I buy it.

I have no problem if EVERY single game would start to be sold for 29.99. But I have a big problem with "losing" money just because a game is 33% off 1 week after release or 50% off 2 months after release.  Why punish me for supporting them? Playing early means nothing to me (especially in times where DLC is a thing) I am a patient person. I am still waiting for my GTA5 on PC.


Switch the metaphor and you're right. Nintendo is just greedy.  also what a straw man. I'm not talking about a week or a couple of months.

No, the metaphor is spot on.

I know. Nintendo is in the minor leagues. They can't even dream of making a game with as much going on and detail as watch dogs grand theft auto or elder scrolls.



Around the Network
fiercedeity said:
bigtakilla said:
fiercedeity said:


Switch the metaphor and you're right. Nintendo is just greedy.  also what a straw man. I'm not talking about a week or a couple of months.

No, the metaphor is spot on.

I know. Nintendo is in the minor leagues. They can't even dream of making a game with as much going on and detail as watch dogs grand theft auto or elder scrolls.

The Superbowl isn't a part of the minor leagues, lol. Good try though.

And Elder Scrolls, Watch Dogs, and Grand Theft Auto? Yeah, staples of great games (if you hate performance, and Watch Dogs, seriously LFMAO!!!).



bigtakilla said:
fiercedeity said:
bigtakilla said:
fiercedeity said:


Switch the metaphor and you're right. Nintendo is just greedy.  also what a straw man. I'm not talking about a week or a couple of months.

No, the metaphor is spot on.

I know. Nintendo is in the minor leagues. They can't even dream of making a game with as much going on and detail as watch dogs grand theft auto or elder scrolls.

The Superbowl isn't a part of the minor leagues, lol. Good try though.

And Elder Scrolls, Watch Dogs, and Grand Theft Auto? Yeah, staples of great games (if you hate performance, and Watch Dogs, seriously LFMAO!!!).


That's why I said switch the metaphor. Performance is based on hardware. Yea those games definitely push the hardware they're on furthermore you're changing the subject. It's not hard to get good performance out of the game Nintendo makes lately. If we look back at when Nintendo was actually pushing things, oot for example, those games didn't have stellar performance either.



fiercedeity said:
bigtakilla said:



The Superbowl isn't a part of the minor leagues, lol. Good try though.

And Elder Scrolls, Watch Dogs, and Grand Theft Auto? Yeah, staples of great games (if you hate performance, and Watch Dogs, seriously LFMAO!!!).


That's why I said switch the metaphor. Performance is based on hardware. Yea those games definitely push the hardware they're on furthermore you're changing the subject. It's not hard to get good performance out of the game Nintendo makes lately. If we look back at when Nintendo was actually pushing things, oot for example, those games didn't have stellar performance either.

And I said no, don't switch the metaphor. It was right the first time. It's okay, let's move on.

If they push the hardware or not is not the issue, they perform better (FAR greater than the games you provided examples for).

OoT was a completely new realm of going from 2D to 3D. It's not really the same. In fact it isn't the same at all. 



Uncharted 4
The Witcher 3
Batman Arkham Knight
Final Fantasy Type-0 HD
Persona 5



Definitely Batman Arkham Knight.