Makes no sense, I know... and some people agree with Obozo, and I'm not sure all of them are Muricans.

You think North Korea could retaliate. We would wiipe North korea off the map before they knew what hit them. Had they the ability to shoot a nuke it would be blown up over there own territory . As for Russia, Obama doens't need to do anything there economy is on the verge of collapsing again. Between Sanctions, Oil prcies being so low and Putin being an arrogant prick it won't be long before they are 20 years behind everyone again.

Uhnnn just muslim terrorists can plain an attack? If they really were to go after their threats they could do it... but as far as I remember NK have promised attacks several times and never done it, always gone back after some bone throw at them.

Why would USA commander-in-chief be worried about the lives of the enemy??? They have attacked several countries and took a lot of lives... or are you saying about loss of military people? If that is it, them it shows how balless Obozo is, and then you would have to agree with me... the possibility of loss of small number of civilian lifes is tens fold that of several military as just one should be involved in wars and attacks.

So I have to meet your standards of reasonability to talk to you? Sure I don't care enough about your opinion to have to see what is acceptable to you or not. You decide if you want to be mature and talk whenever a disagreement exists or if you preffer the attack me or my "reasonability" when I strongly disagree with me and calls immature.

Do you really believe it?

USA already lost a war to a country that had really small fighting force. And NK have a big army... so unless they do their unilateral war of dropping bomb from afar and destroy the whole country to avoid loss then nothing is warranted.

Irak didn't had any economical strengh and was invaded just the same... any apologism to Obozo won't make much sense as he have several contradictions between words and acts... a true politician, and a left wing at that... just speeches and nothing to show.

Ah typical obama twisting something around. The majority of movie theaters decided that they we're not gonna show that movie. Sony canceled it's release after that. It could still release it via dvd and streaming services.

Why don't you go fight in the front lines in Iraq if that's something you believe in? Nothing like warhawks who are actually chickenhawks when it comes to participating themselves. Iraq probably was better off under Saddam Hussein than the gong show it is today. 

Countries like Russia and North Korea are more bluster than substance, they talk a big game, but the US and their allies can cripple them overnight if they really wanted to. Look at the Russian rouble and the state of their economy now. 

I never negated to answer to you... you that wanted to be ignored, so you decide what you want.

few civilian casualties from USA people, that is what which Obama cares or should. They didn't cared about civilian lifes in all other invasions, so I don't see why would they care on this case.

Uhnnnn I think terrorism is possible independent of allowance of Murica, but sure 9/11 type of cases really needs some colaboration on my opinion. But yes, I don't see any terrorist cell being able to retaliate enough for a war... but they can take enough lifes to make people panic and renegate their rights.

I just disagree on Obozo position... for me all life of good doers is sacred, be they civil, militar, from USA or NK. So if conflict can be warned it should. But Obozo chasting on Sony is quite hypocritical when he doesn't follow any of it. But then, that is exactly what left wing do. The old "accusate my oponent of what I do".

Obama's right, Sony are laughable cowards. Seriously, does North Korea even have electricity yet? How can anyone who isn't a coward possibly be afraid of a joke country?

Please reads all my posts or at least know me better before coming fumming at me.

If I wanted to wage war on someone I would be there, not pressing buttoms. What I'm criticizing is Obozo big mouth, of calling Sony on something he doesn't do.

And if for you a war that you lose less soldiers than you kill civilians is right, then I'm sorry, I disagree... Iraq was totaly unecessary.

If you don't know I'm brazilian, and our country is a chicken on war, we avoid it at all costs... WW1 and 2 we just participated because of pressure from USA or Europe. We don't really bother with going at other countries, so I don't know how could I be on USA ranks to invade Iraq... but sure if Brazil was to be invaded Brazil I would probably pick on arms to defend it (even tough I don't think the government deserves any defense, and I want to move to USA).

Are you an alt by the way?

I think Sony was wavering on releasing this all along, getting movie chains to back kind of gave them an easy out. I don't really buy that every movie theater refused as well. There are plenty of independant theaters that still are saying they would show the movie, why not let them play it? Why is Paramount also backing off from letting other theaters that want to play Team America?

The problem is this sends a message to other countries like China and Russia and Iran that you can "win" on cyberterrorism, so while Sony and the movie theater chains may have saved their hides for now, they are setting a very dangerous precedent for everyone else. 

But I don't think the President really "chastized" them, I think he actually had a good press conference that put North Korea in their place pretty good. What does it say about them that they are scared of a Seth Rogan movie (which drew laughter).