Moshimoo said:
Why don't you go fight in the front lines in Iraq if that's something you believe in? Nothing like warhawks who are actually chickenhawks when it comes to participating themselves. Iraq probably was better off under Saddam Hussein than the gong show it is today. Countries like Russia and North Korea are more bluster than substance, they talk a big game, but the US and their allies can cripple them overnight if they really wanted to. Look at the Russian rouble and the state of their economy now. |
Please reads all my posts or at least know me better before coming fumming at me.
If I wanted to wage war on someone I would be there, not pressing buttoms. What I'm criticizing is Obozo big mouth, of calling Sony on something he doesn't do.
And if for you a war that you lose less soldiers than you kill civilians is right, then I'm sorry, I disagree... Iraq was totaly unecessary.
If you don't know I'm brazilian, and our country is a chicken on war, we avoid it at all costs... WW1 and 2 we just participated because of pressure from USA or Europe. We don't really bother with going at other countries, so I don't know how could I be on USA ranks to invade Iraq... but sure if Brazil was to be invaded Brazil I would probably pick on arms to defend it (even tough I don't think the government deserves any defense, and I want to move to USA).
Are you an alt by the way?

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







