By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Nintendo is bragging about their high quality games :P

biglittlesps on 19 December 2014
vkaraujo said:
I like it and i don't get the hate.

They need to advertise their system and what they have now is more critically acclaimed titles. Metacritic score is a excellent way to do that to the masses.

I also think it is good timing after the problems and disappointments of big titles this year like Watch Dogs, Destiny, Assassin's Creed Unity, Drive Club and MCC. In the end Nintendo needs to stand by the Wii U quality, both from a marketing and development perspective, since that's what they have left.

Well these are new iP's and developed for the consoles in first year. Also these games cater different market and those Nintendo old IP's are very differnet from these games so it will not make above games gamers happy even though Nintendo games high scores because its targated for different users.



GAMING is not about spending hours to pass/waste our time just for fun,

its a Feeling/Experience about a VIRTUAL WORLD we can never be in real, and realizing some of our dreams (also creating new ones).

So, Feel Emotions, Experience Adventure/Action, Challenge Game, Solve puzzles and Have fun.

PlayStation is about all-round "New experiences" using new IP's to provide great diversity for everyone.

Xbox is always about Online and Shooting.

Nintendo is always about Fun games and milking IP's.

Around the Network
yvanjean on 19 December 2014
bubblegamer said:
PwerlvlAmy said:
Nintendo is stating facts

Where did these "facts" go during the Wii times?


http://www.metacritic.com/browse/games/release-date/available/wii/metascore

Galaxy 1 & 2, Two zelda games, Super Smash Brawl, Xenoblade Chronicles, Metroid Prime 3, NEW super MArio Bros. Wii, Super Paper Mario, 

Sin & Punishment, Boom Blox.



KLXVER on 19 December 2014
outlawauron said:

Btw, there's some additional criteria at work. Vita alone has 9 games with 85 meta and 8.5+ user score (really should be 10 since Vita has a better version of Virtue's Last Reward + no game breaking bugs).

Which I'm now thinking was purposed excluded in the comparison.


and all those are retail releases?



o_O.Q on 19 December 2014

its funny how before it was sales that mattered and not scores and now its the opposite



TheGoldenBoy on 19 December 2014

Good for Nintendo, but using metacritic user scores is laughable.



Around the Network
AshKetchum1992 on 19 December 2014

I think the biggest question here is if the general public will see this .

Edit: but their qualifiers are weird, why only retail? and they separate pokemon x and y but that's how advertising works XD



mysteryman on 19 December 2014
o_O.Q said:
its funny how before it was sales that mattered and not scores and now its the opposite

Welcome to the previous gen.



bananaking21 on 19 December 2014
Ali_16x said:


Of course the guy with the Zelda avatar is going to actually defend X and Y as seperate games, LOL. I swear to god buying the other version is like DLC, the only difference is a few pokemon and the color of the enemy shirts, wow amazing, totally different games /s.


i dont understand why they even make two "games". i understand its to sucker people into buying both. but whats their excuse?

serious question here.



KLXVER on 19 December 2014
bananaking21 said:
Ali_16x said:


Of course the guy with the Zelda avatar is going to actually defend X and Y as seperate games, LOL. I swear to god buying the other version is like DLC, the only difference is a few pokemon and the color of the enemy shirts, wow amazing, totally different games /s.


i dont understand why they even make two "games". i understand its to sucker people into buying both. but whats their excuse?

serious question here.


Its so when you buy one version, you can trade Pokemon with people who own the other version.



bananaking21 on 19 December 2014
KLXVER said:
bananaking21 said:
Ali_16x said:


Of course the guy with the Zelda avatar is going to actually defend X and Y as seperate games, LOL. I swear to god buying the other version is like DLC, the only difference is a few pokemon and the color of the enemy shirts, wow amazing, totally different games /s.


i dont understand why they even make two "games". i understand its to sucker people into buying both. but whats their excuse?

serious question here.


Its so when you buy one version, you can trade Pokemon with people who own the other version.


why cant they all be in the same version, and everybody can trade with everybody?