In number of titles to sell over 1M the Wii has some catch up to do, but in number of copies sold across all millions sellers the Wii is now on pair with the 360. Both are at about 70M... 

Some people still don't understand that alot of extremely casual gamers are buying the Wii, and they like games that hardcore gamers find shallow. The people who do reviews for gaming outlets are hardcore gamers. Do the math.

No the reality is most people have poor taste and wouldn't know something good if it came and hit them in the face, even tho britney spears doesn't have the best voice, most of her songs aren't anything special and she generally gets bad reviews her records still sell alot. Why? Because people are buying her music for all the wrong reasons. Just because a new demographic of gamers has come to the for front (a.k.a. casual gamers) and they have latched onto shallow, short, easy mini games collections that have nearly always scored poorly doesn't suddenly make these poor games good, they are still poor games regardless of how much they sell.

People buy games because they enjoy them. Just like why people go to the movies. Are the Best Picture Nominees all the highest grossing pictures. No

This is an entertainment medium. Wii has proven and continues to prove it is better at entertaining the masses then the competition. And quite frankly I like the idea of of game developers focusing on making me happy.

As for Sonic is good that ioi keeps improving the European tracking. The Wii in particular probably has had some big numbers we are unaware of.

If I recall correctly Nintendo reported that they had sold 70% of total gamecube software through December 07. 14 months versus 6 years. If people are impressed by this list now wait until generations end.

@ Jimmay
You lost all credibility when you said reveiwers are unbiased.

So you say people are buying everything and only some can tell what is good and what not?

I'm glad you are not the one to decide over the political system in my country, because you'd surely install a dictator. Your opinion is against all the theories of free will, Liberalism and democracy.

Now you may think I am exagerating, but this is really where your way of thinking is leading to. Of course sometimes a bad game, a bad artist or a bad film gets great sales, but those media are usually  "bad" in a different way than the rock band of your brother. For example, there are a lot of things that can be said against Britney Spears, but she actually is a good singer and had good songs. In my opinion, her songs are bullshit compared to the album of Kate Nash, but I still prefer her over Mary J. Blige for example, while other people may think that Kate Nash is bullshit and MJB the best thing in the world. Best selling things aren't usually the best, but the things most people like somehow, i.e. the general consensus. That doesn't make them bad, that only makes them less special than some less popular artists.

 This works the exact same way for games. You can sit down and have a lot of fun playing Mario Party. This is nowhere near the joy you have when you are playing an epic single player game, but it's still fun. Here's the great difference to other low rated games as HappySquirrel already pointed out: Mario Party is not rated low because of it's flaws like other 70 % games, but because it isn't heading the same way as epic games.

Wow, you're bitter ...

Certainly, by your standards Britney Spears is an awful muscian but I'm certain that any music you actually like would be considered awful by the standards of Opera or Classical music standards. The thing that you don't seem to get is that your music analogy was (by far) the worst choice you could make. Music Reviewers are actually very professional and have reviewing standards which are relative to the genre of music they're reviewing ... Britney Spears' latest album (Blackout) has received a 61 on metacritic afterall ...

Yet another typical fanboy response, reviewers are payed to give as unbiased review as humanly possible, their opinions hold far more weight then an average poster on a forum who can be as biased as they want and dont have to justify themselves. Reviewers have to back up theri opinions with facts.

 QFT

Of course Erikers is nothing but an Xbox fanbitch so he's easy to own.  I think he enjoys it.

Talk about completly missing the point, the fact is people can like whatever they want to like, i never said any different. To put it simply just because somebody likes something the best doesn't mean it actually is the best. For decades gamers have accepted that the average review score from professional reviewers is a very good indicator of how good a game is. Every generation without fail the console with the most top rated games is the console that wins the generation. This has now gone all back to front because casual gamers have come along and they don't have a clue what a good game is.

Lets use motor racing as an example. Fans of motor racing like the skill of the drivers, they like the technical knowledge of building a car, they like the excitement of overtaking, cornering, quick pit stops and team tactics. A good race is one that contains all of those things. Now lets say their is a new casual crowd that has come along to watch racing, they don't really care about the things i mentioned above, all they care about is how many crashes their are, also because they don't really care that much about racing they can't be bothered to watch an hour long race, they can only be bothered with a 20 minute race. So yet again the casual crowd don't have a clue about what makes a good race just like they don't have a clue what makes a good game. A race with poor drivers, poorly built cars, no overtaking, amature pit stops and bad team tactics is a terrible race no matter how you slice it, if in that race their were a bunch of spectacular crashes the the casual crowd loved does that now make the race a good one??? Hell no, it was still a terrible race with a bunch of casual people with poor taste completely oblivious.