4D Gamer III on 05 March 2008
Of all the sources that offer varying conclusions on this subject its no surprise the one people choose to believe is the one which best suits their personal bias. Incidentally I'm accused of trying to downplay the topic and OP when had the results been to the opposite benefit of the 360 or Wii it would be the Sony Right that would be rushing in to play down the significance of that blow against Sony. For example, Shams tried to bring up a comparison between the PSP and PS3 in its own thread and it was attacked as being anti-Sony.
I've not brought up a single point in this thread that wasn't unreasonable given the conflicting sources presented. You will forgive me though if I don't ignore the irony of the Sony faithful here who throughout the forums make it an every day habbit of trying to play up every trivial "victory" that can be offered Sony and then demonize and denounce even the most benign of negative news or discussion whether intended as such or not.
Which ever source we accept though, we know Nintendo and Sony are neck and neck, and that enough is impressive for Sony.
The Ghost of RubangB said:
1: Stop making shooters. Please. You're not Valve or Free Radical.
2: Stop trying to force photo-realism down my throat until you can get out of the uncanny valley. Work on style and presentation instead of just pixels and bloom.
3: Try something weird and new, and hope we like it.
You'll cut costs way more than you cut revenue, and thus increase profit.
4D Gamer III on 06 March 2008
windbane said:
Kasz216 said:
tastyshovelware said:
4D Gamer III said: Sony's sweet advantage? Sony's only able to edge ahead of Nintendo by such a narrow margin that its within the margin of error as clearly shown by Metacritics results. This is no real victory for Sony unless you were expecting much less from Sony to begin with.
Again another matter of people wanting to believe reviews as gods law when it suits them and attacking them when they don't (I'm pointing fingers at both parties in the discussion here too).
If only this victory for Sony actually in anyway mattered. *shakes head* |
metacritic isn't the most reliable site. it weighs reviews as it pleases. gamerankings is way better. and i think you're being a bit harsh. it's like your coming down on sony for having games people generally like. would you be happier if they only released sh*t like conspiracy games? |
Eh disagree. Sure the weighing should be transparent... however Play Magazine shoudln't be worth the same as IGN. Or an individual user review.
|
Weighting should indeed be revealed. Until then, I'd rather go by an unbiased source in gamerankings. |
Unbiased because they support the conclusions you wish to believe?
The Ghost of RubangB said:
1: Stop making shooters. Please. You're not Valve or Free Radical.
2: Stop trying to force photo-realism down my throat until you can get out of the uncanny valley. Work on style and presentation instead of just pixels and bloom.
3: Try something weird and new, and hope we like it.
You'll cut costs way more than you cut revenue, and thus increase profit.