More like cost concious. If ps3 had sold very health on 500-600 maybe systems would be more powerfull. But when Sony charge 600 losing 200 for each sold unit, sell slower and is bad mouthed for it I can see why they would preffer ps4 prices. Acc inflation ps4 launched for like half the price of ps3.

I would easily pay 600 for more HP but the Mass Market have speaked loudly.

This generation feels more like enhancement of the past generation, not a generation leap forward.
Now this could be attributed to PS3 and Xbox360 being amazing hardware, that it was hard to leap forward that greatly.

Though not the type of game that requires twitch reflexes or a whole lot of precision, 60fps would've been great. Oh well, it still looks awesome and maybe they can get it to 60fps in the sequel.

you guys and your obsession with 60 faps per second. i'll never understand...

The thing is I don't really care for 60, I am not the biggest fan of 30 because 30 still can go downwards sadly. I would say if they created 40-50 level. It would Satisfy me greatly.

My 600€ gaming PC would run it at 60FPS.

It doesn´t work like that. It would make the picture run really laggy.

Really? what emulator are you using? I dont remember it being on PC.

40-50 is awkward due to tv refresh rates.   i can't tell the differnce between 30 and 60 but i can sure as hell can tell the difference between barren levels and populated levels.   it's not that 60 isn't better than 30 it's just that on the list of things that improve my game experience i just don't have a fuck to give.

Ahh, I was wondering why they never used a mid point. Now I know.