I'm not the most tech savvy person but exactly why is it not possible? For a moment lets forget arguments like inventory, losses and all that. Why is it impossible? Can't the Wii U just be patched to work without the Gamepad, similar to what they did with the Kinect. Can't they patch those few games that absolutely need it, to make them work without it? I understand it would require some work but why wouldn't that be possible?

It's not gonna happen at this point but I feel like this is something they should have considered before launching the console as well as a year into it, when it was already obvious sales were struggling. At this point, they might as well ride it out for another year or two, attempt to stay profitable and release the WiiU&Me or whatever they have up their sleeve.

The Genesis was successful because it had lots of third party games, whereas the Sega Master System had (basically) none. So that just proves this is not a Nintendo thing, even the two most success traditional Nintendo consoles -- the NES and SNES, basically relied on the same formula the Playstation and XBox do today. 

those bugs will be fixed? they just patch out gamebreaking bugs, thats all.

and sure a high quality game could be terrible(im looking at you brawl), but for other reasons.

and games full of bugs and with bad controlls can be brilliant (shadows of the glitches).

but most of the time, high quality games arent terrible, why? because nobody  hunts months for bugs if the game is bad anyway.

buying nintendo games is much easyer than buying other games, because u dont have to consider quality, they are all fine, never had a bad one. so u just have to decide if u are interested in the genre/gameplay/story or not.

I heard sony is in truble and struggeling. Its not the best selling console of nintendo, but its not a problem for nintendo. Sonys money is ending I heard. I am extreme more worried about sony!

Moderated,

-Mr Khan

IM not judging anything. Dont put words in my mouth. I made no comments. Im stating that you're OPINIONS on what is quality is not right and they are OPINIONS and going by the numbers just reinforces that your beliefs are just that YOUR beliefs.

but see thats the thing you refuse to understand if a person thinks that game with glitches is better than the one without, that is a quality game to them. More people buy Elder Scrolls games than they do Metroid despite the former having more bugs, they dont care the game is that fun to them that it overrides the bugs, hell the bugs might be part of the fun. 

going by the numbers wii fit is 70 times better than ico&shadow of the colossus collection for ps3...

nice way of proving me wrong with numbers.  or am i using the numbers wrong?

again you fail. I make no comments on quality because it is subjective. YOU are the one trying to make quality objective. It isnt. IF it was then the games you deemed quality would be doing much better and they are not.

quality and sales arnt the same, a high quality game can flop and a low quality game can sale gangbusters.

why? because the most people are stupid and dont realy care for quality (or even fun), they just do what they told to.

What Nintendo needs to do is support itself by bridging their HH & console gap, both in content &  a HH more powerful than Ninty's usual ($250 launch would be justified this go round). Don't be el cheapo on the hw, make it Vita-ish impressive upon launch.