generic-user-1 said:
Ka-pi96 said:
generic-user-1 said:
Ka-pi96 said:
generic-user-1 said:
so u judge games quality by looking at the sales? so the wii sports/fit franchise has the highest quality of all time?
|
Seems pretty obvious to me that he is just saying quality is subjective...
|
yes, im know, he doesnt understand that thats wrong. the quality is objective, if u like a game or not, thats subjective.
u can dislike the game with the best quality ever, and u can like et 2600, nothing wrong with that, but saying et 2600 has higher quality than smb because u like it more is WRONG.
|
Quality most certainly is subjective. Somebody has got to decide what should be deemed as quality before they can say how much quality it has, therefore it is very much subjective.
|
yeah, somebody had to decide if a game with shitloads of bugs and glitches is better or one without those bugs.
and somebody had to decide if working controlls are better or those that dont respond at all.
and @soundwave who said u arnt allowed to play and enjoy low quality games?
and the mastersystem was so succesfull, but the Genesis WAS.
|
but see thats the thing you refuse to understand if a person thinks that game with glitches is better than the one without, that is a quality game to them. More people buy Elder Scrolls games than they do Metroid despite the former having more bugs, they dont care the game is that fun to them that it overrides the bugs, hell the bugs might be part of the fun.
